On Jan 6, 2013, at 04:00 , Pfeiffer, Steven wrote:
Hello,
For an experiment, I selected plots of land within a forest either with
honeysuckle or without honeysuckle. Thus, my main factor is fixed, with 2
levels: honeysuckle present(n=11) and honeysuckle absent(n=8).
Within each plot of
On 1/6/2013 12:45 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Jan 6, 2013, at 04:00 , Pfeiffer, Steven wrote:
Hello,
For an experiment, I selected plots of land within a forest either with
honeysuckle or without honeysuckle. Thus, my main factor is fixed, with 2
levels: honeysuckle present(n=11) and
On Jan 6, 2013, at 09:45 , peter dalgaard wrote:
Just avoid things like Type-III sums of squares (base R won't do them, but
popular add-ons will) because they get it wrong when cell counts are unequal.
That might be a bit unfair. Type-III methodology has its proponents, I'm just
not one
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of peter dalgaard
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2013 1:56 PM
To: peter dalgaard
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] nested, unbalanced anova
On Jan 6, 2013, at 09:45
Hello,
For an experiment, I selected plots of land within a forest either with
honeysuckle or without honeysuckle. Thus, my main factor is fixed, with 2
levels: honeysuckle present(n=11) and honeysuckle absent(n=8).
Within each plot of land, I have a trenched subplot and an untrenched
subplot.
5 matches
Mail list logo