Packages pROC and ROCR both calculate/approximate the Area Under (Receiver
Operator) Curve. However the results are different.
I am computing a new variable as a predictor for a label. The new variable is a
(non-linear) function of a set of input values, and I'm checking how different
A reproducible example sent to the package maintainer(s)
might yield results.
Max
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Ivana Cace i.c...@ati-a.nl wrote:
Packages pROC and ROCR both calculate/approximate the Area Under (Receiver
Operator) Curve. However the results are different.
I am computing
On Dec 19, 2012, at 4:47 AM, Ivana Cace wrote:
Packages pROC and ROCR both calculate/approximate the Area Under (Receiver
Operator) Curve. However the results are different.
I am computing a new variable as a predictor for a label. The new variable is
a (non-linear) function of a set of
I considered that but on the list more people are likely to see it. So if they
ran into the same thing they may already have figured out what is going on and
have answers.
Or if not, I'll make a reproducible example, ask the maintainers and post back
here where others may find it.
(but not
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Ivana Cace i.c...@ati-a.nl wrote:
I considered that but on the list more people are likely to see it. So if
they ran into the same thing they may already have figured out what is going
on and have answers.
Or if not, I'll make a reproducible example, ask the
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Ivana Cace i.c...@ati-a.nl wrote:
I considered that but on the list more people are likely to see it. So if
they ran into the same thing they may already have figured out what is
going on and have answers.
Or if not, I'll make a reproducible example, ask the
6 matches
Mail list logo
