Thanks for that Gabor, it works fine from the development version
you've pointed to.
There is in addition a performance issue: the following benchmark ran
in under 0.2s in the previous version, now consistently shows elapsed
time over 14s on a Xeon with Windows. It's unaffected if I use the
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Giles giles.heyw...@amberalpha.com wrote:
Thanks for that Gabor, it works fine from the development version
you've pointed to.
There is in addition a performance issue: the following benchmark ran
in under 0.2s in the previous version, now consistently shows
Hi.
I'm comparing output from rollapply.zoo, as produced by two versions
of R and package zoo. I'm illustrating with an example from a R-help
posting 'Zoo - bug ???' dated 2010-07-13.
My question is not about the first version, or the questions raised in
that posting, because the behaviour is
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Giles giles.heyw...@cantab.net wrote:
Hi.
I'm comparing output from rollapply.zoo, as produced by two versions
of R and package zoo. I'm illustrating with an example from a R-help
posting 'Zoo - bug ???' dated 2010-07-13.
My question is not about the first
4 matches
Mail list logo