Robinson [mailto:a.robin...@ms.unimelb.edu.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:13 PM
> To: Pang Du
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] two-way group mean prediction in survreg with three
factors
>
> I hope not!
>
> Facetiousness aside, the model that you
2011 10:13 PM
> To: Pang Du
> Cc: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R] two-way group mean prediction in survreg with three factors
>
> I hope not!
>
> Facetiousness aside, the model that you have fit contains C, and,
> indeed, an interaction between A and C. So, the effect
.au]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:13 PM
To: Pang Du
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] two-way group mean prediction in survreg with three factors
I hope not!
Facetiousness aside, the model that you have fit contains C, and,
indeed, an interaction between A and C. So, the effect of A upon th
I hope not!
Facetiousness aside, the model that you have fit contains C, and,
indeed, an interaction between A and C. So, the effect of A upon the
response variable depends on the level of C. The summary you want
must marginalize C somehow, probably by a weighted or unweighted
average across its
I'm fitting a regression model for censored data with three categorical
predictors, say A, B, C. My final model based on the survreg function is
Surv(..) ~ A*(B+C).
I know the three-way group mean estimates can be computed using the predict
function. But is there any way to obtain two-way group
5 matches
Mail list logo