Re: [R] underflow of fisher.test result

2009-11-04 Thread Ted Harding
On 01-Nov-09 20:23:30, Peng Yu wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote: On 20-Oct-09 13:34:49, Peng Yu wrote: fisher.test() gives a very small p-value, which is underflow on my machine. However, the log of it should not be underflow. I'm

Re: [R] underflow of fisher.test result

2009-11-01 Thread Peng Yu
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote: On 20-Oct-09 13:34:49, Peng Yu wrote: fisher.test() gives a very small p-value, which is underflow on my machine. However, the log of it should not be underflow. I'm wondering if there is a way get log() of a

[R] underflow of fisher.test result

2009-10-20 Thread Peng Yu
fisher.test() gives a very small p-value, which is underflow on my machine. However, the log of it should not be underflow. I'm wondering if there is a way get log() of a small p-value. An approximation is acceptable in this case. Thank you!

Re: [R] underflow of fisher.test result

2009-10-20 Thread Ted Harding
On 20-Oct-09 13:34:49, Peng Yu wrote: fisher.test() gives a very small p-value, which is underflow on my machine. However, the log of it should not be underflow. I'm wondering if there is a way get log() of a small p-value. An approximation is acceptable in this case. Thank you!

Re: [R] underflow of fisher.test result

2009-10-20 Thread Peng Yu
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Ted Harding ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote: On 20-Oct-09 13:34:49, Peng Yu wrote: fisher.test() gives a very small p-value, which is underflow on my machine. However, the log of it should not be underflow. I'm wondering if there is a way get log() of a