On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote:
The following code should return 1, but it returns 0:
source(http://r-bc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/R/bc.R;)
bc(9 % 2)
See FAQ 2 on the r-bc package home page:
http://r-bc.googlecode.com
Thanks to all
Paul Smith phhs80 at gmail.com writes:
Dear All,
The following code should return 1, but it returns 0:
source(http://r-bc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/R/bc.R;)
bc(9 % 2)
Do you confirm this bug?
It's not a bug in r-bc, it's a misfeature (?) in bc.
It has to do with the 'scale'
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
The following code should return 1, but it returns 0:
source(http://r-bc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/R/bc.R;)
bc(9 % 2)
See FAQ 2 on the r-bc package home page:
http://r-bc.googlecode.com
Gabor Grothendieck ggrothendieck at gmail.com writes:
See FAQ 2 on the r-bc package home page:
http://r-bc.googlecode.com
This is getting a little bit self-referential -- that FAQ refers to
the previous message in this thread ...
__
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Ben Bolker bbol...@gmail.com wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck ggrothendieck at gmail.com writes:
See FAQ 2 on the r-bc package home page:
http://r-bc.googlecode.com
This is getting a little bit self-referential -- that FAQ refers to
the previous message in this
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote:
The following code should return 1, but it returns 0:
source(http://r-bc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/R/bc.R;)
bc(9 % 2)
See FAQ 2 on the r-bc package home page:
http://r-bc.googlecode.com
Thanks to all
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Paul Smith phh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Gabor Grothendieck
ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote:
The following code should return 1, but it returns 0:
source(http://r-bc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/R/bc.R;)
bc(9 % 2)
See FAQ 2 on the
7 matches
Mail list logo