I am glad to have joined such an active online community! I assume from your
R code that the deviance reported by R for quasi... families is not
quasi-deviance and that the following function summarizes the calculation
(note that I have added a parameter to k to account for the estimation of
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kunio takezawa
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:41 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Estimating QAIC using glm with the quasibinomial family
R-users
E-mail: r-help@r-project.org
My question is: Will this calculation be valid with the residual
R-users
E-mail: r-help@r-project.org
but I was specificly interested in calculating QAIC and QAICc from
a glm fitted with the family=quasibinomial option.
If you use family=quasibinomial(link = logit) in glm(),
the program will be:
function ()
{
xx - c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
yy -
R-users
E-mail: r-help@r-project.org
My question is: Will this calculation be valid with the residual deviance
returned by the glm() function using the quasibinomial family as
reported in R?
Let me show you a simple example, assuming c=2.5:
function ()
{
xx - c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)
yy
4 matches
Mail list logo
