Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-06 Thread Scott Raynaud
0.7996266 0.7997703 0.8002355 0.8009229 0.8014502 0.8015201 [29] 0.8013688 0.8016032 0.8025078 0.8035148 0.8040642   From: Bert Gunter gunter.ber...@gene.com Cc: r-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R Consider

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-06 Thread Scott Raynaud
0.8014502 0.8015201 [29] 0.8013688 0.8016032 0.8025078 0.8035148 0.8040642   From: Bert Gunter gunter.ber...@gene.com Cc: r-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R Consider: f - function(x){ x- 10;x^2} f() [1

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-06 Thread David Winsemius
On Oct 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Scott Raynaud wrote: I'm re-posting this since it did not appear at the end of the thread. Sorry for the inconvenience. Not sure why it's giving the message: An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... As far as I know my replies are set up as

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Joshua Wiley
Hi Scott, I am not familiar with S-Plus (though many aspects are quite similar to R). I will say that your function looks approximately correct. I am not familiar with the ss.rand function. I searched, and found some things that I suspect are similar in the packages MBESS, but without knowing

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Spencer Graves
When R was invented, nearly all of the core R functions were written to produce exactly the same answers as those returned by S-Plus. Some very minor exceptions were made for time series functions, for example, where better algorithms in R produced slightly better fits. There may be

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Patrick Burns
I had thought that the problem might be: return(ne=ne1) since R doesn't support that any more. But when I tried it, I got results (just without the name on the output). Better would be to change that line to: list(ne=ne1) ('return' is seldom necessary in either R or S+.) I'd suggest putting

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Barry Rowlingson
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Scott Raynaud scott.rayn...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm trying to convert an S-Plus program to R.  Since I'm a SAS programmer I'm not facile is either S-Plus or R, so I need some help.  All I did was convert the underscores in S-Plus to the assignment operator -. 

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Scott Raynaud
: Re: [R] SPlus to R te: I'm trying to convert an S-Plus program to R.  Since I'm a SAS programmer I'm not facile is either S-Plus or R, so I need some help.  All I did was convert the underscores in S-Plus to the assignment operator -.  Here are the first few lines of the S-Plus file

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Kevin E. Thorpe
Rowlingsonb.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk Cc: r-help@r-project.orgr-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 4:02 AM Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R te: I'm trying to convert an S-Plus program to R. Since I'm a SAS programmer I'm not facile is either S-Plus or R, so I need some help. All I did

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Uwe Ligges
-project.orgr-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 4:02 AM Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R te: I'm trying to convert an S-Plus program to R. Since I'm a SAS programmer I'm not facile is either S-Plus or R, so I need some help. All I did was convert the underscores in S-Plus

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Barry Rowlingson
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Scott Raynaud scott.rayn...@yahoo.com wrote: Hope I did this right.  I repeated what I'd done before: 1) Opened script 2) Selected run all (this produced my inital post Then as suggested I: 3) Typed ls() 4) Saw that the function was present and issued

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread William Dunlap
It looks like this code was written for S+ 4.5 (aka '2000') or before, which was based on S version 3. Try changing return(name1=value1, name2=value2) to return(list(name1=value1, name2=value2)) In S+ from 5.0 onwards return(name=value) or return(name1=value1, name2=value2) throws away the

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread William Dunlap
@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R It looks like this code was written for S+ 4.5 (aka '2000') or before, which was based on S version 3. Try changing return(name1=value1, name2=value2) to return(list(name1=value1, name2=value2)) In S+ from 5.0 onwards return(name=value

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Barry Rowlingson
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Scott Raynaud scott.rayn...@yahoo.com wrote: It seems I have things set up correctly.  I suspect that the arguments sshc(100,10) are the isuue.  It seems that the 100,10 is not necessary since the code itself specifies the arguments.  It runs and produces a power

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread William Dunlap
:08 AM To: Scott Raynaud Cc: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Scott Raynaud scott.rayn...@yahoo.com wrote: It seems I have things set up correctly.  I suspect that the arguments sshc(100,10) are the isuue.  It seems that the 100,10

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Scott Raynaud
; r-help@r-project.org r-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R On 05.10.2011 13:44, Scott Raynaud wrote: Hope I did this right.  I repeated what I'd done before: 1) Opened script 2) Selected run all (this produced my inital post

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Scott Raynaud
), right?  I;m still not sure, however, why that would be necessary since it's hard coded. From: Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk Cc: r-help@r-project.org r-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 9:27 AM Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R ote

Re: [R] SPlus to R

2011-10-05 Thread Bert Gunter
, however, why that would be necessary since it's hard coded. From: Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk Cc: r-help@r-project.org r-help@r-project.org Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 9:27 AM Subject: Re: [R] SPlus to R ote: Hope I did