SW == Samuel Wuest wue...@tcd.ie
on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:26 +0100 writes:
SW Hi Greg,
SW thanks for the suggestion:
SW I have attached some small dataset that can be used to reproduce the
SW odd behavior of the approxfun-function.
SW If it gets stripped off my email,
On 11/09/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
SW == Samuel Wuest wue...@tcd.ie
on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:26 +0100 writes:
SW Hi Greg,
SW thanks for the suggestion:
SW I have attached some small dataset that can be used to reproduce the
SW odd behavior of the
On Sep 11, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
SW == Samuel Wuest wue...@tcd.ie
on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:26 +0100 writes:
SW Hi Greg,
SW thanks for the suggestion:
SW I have attached some small dataset that can be used to
reproduce the
SW odd behavior of the
MM == Martin Maechler maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch
on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:04:37 +0200 writes:
SW == Samuel Wuest wue...@tcd.ie
on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:26 +0100 writes:
SW Hi Greg,
SW thanks for the suggestion:
SW I have attached some small dataset that can be used to
On 11/09/2010 10:53 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
MM == Martin Maechler maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch
on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:04:37 +0200 writes:
SW == Samuel Wuest wue...@tcd.ie
on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:26 +0100 writes:
SW Hi Greg,
SW thanks for the suggestion:
SW I have
Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:32:38 -0400 writes:
On 11/09/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
SW == Samuel Wuest wue...@tcd.ie
on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:26 +0100 writes:
SW Hi Greg,
SW thanks for the suggestion:
SW I
On 11/09/2010 11:13 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:32:38 -0400 writes:
On 11/09/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
SW == Samuel Wuest wue...@tcd.ie
on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:26 +0100 writes:
SW Hi Greg,
Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:23:02 -0400 writes:
On 11/09/2010 11:13 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:32:38 -0400 writes:
On 11/09/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Hi Martin,
indeed, as mentioned in the bug-report, the results are inconsistent,
and each time I rerun, I get different results... Sometimes, the range
is correct even on my machine, but mostly I get values 1 back:
Here is another run:
### load the data: a list called approx.data
pbrbrbr/p
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented,
Hi Greg,
thanks for the suggestion:
I have attached some small dataset that can be used to reproduce the
odd behavior of the approxfun-function.
If it gets stripped off my email, it can also be downloaded at:
http://bioinf.gen.tcd.ie/approx.data.Rdata
Strangely, the problem seems specific to
-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] approxfun-problems (yleft and yright ignored)
Hi Greg,
thanks for the suggestion:
I have attached some small dataset that can be used to reproduce the
odd behavior of the approxfun-function.
If it gets stripped off my email, it can also be downloaded
: Samuel Wuest [mailto:wue...@tcd.ie]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 7:34 AM
To: Greg Snow
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] approxfun-problems (yleft and yright ignored)
Hi Greg,
thanks for the suggestion:
I have attached some small dataset that can be used to reproduce the
odd
The plots did not come through, see the posting guide for which attachments are
allowed. It will be easier for us to help if you can send reproducible code
(we can copy and paste to run, then examine, edit, etc.). Try finding a subset
of your data for which the problem still occurs, then send
14 matches
Mail list logo
