[mailto:
r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of Something Something
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 5:28 PM
To: Phil Spector; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks for the replies everyone. Greatly appreciate it. Some
progress,
but
now I am
PM
To: kMan
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thank you so much, kMan. That makes sense. Only one question, how can I
see the value of 'error'? Here's what I see:
Call:
lm(formula = Y ~ X1 * X2 * X3, na.action = na.exclude)
Coefficients:
(Intercept) X1 X2
-project.org]
On Behalf Of Something Something
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 5:28 PM
To: Phil Spector; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks for the replies everyone. Greatly appreciate it. Some progress,
but
now I am getting the following values when I don't use
...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of Something Something
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 5:28 PM
To: Phil Spector; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks for the replies everyone. Greatly appreciate it. Some progress,
but
now I am getting the following values when
Genentech Nonclinical Statistics
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On
Behalf Of Something Something
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 1:24 PM
To: Daniel Nordlund
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks Dan. Yes that was very helpful. I didn't see the change
from '*'
to
'+'.
Seems like when I put * it means - interaction when I put + it's
not an
interaction.
Is it correct to assume then that...
When I put + R evaluates
Nonclinical Statistics
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On
Behalf Of Something Something
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 1:24 PM
To: Daniel Nordlund
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks Dan
Something
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 1:24 PM
To: Daniel Nordlund
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks Dan. Yes that was very helpful. I didn't see the change from '*'
to
'+'.
Seems like when I put * it means - interaction when I put + it's
-
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Something Something
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 5:04 PM
To: Bert Gunter
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
I tried..
mod = lm(Y ~ X1*X2
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 1:24 PM
To: Daniel Nordlund
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks Dan. Yes that was very helpful. I didn't see the change from '*'
to
'+'.
Seems like when I put * it means - interaction when I put + it's not an
interaction
Thanks for the replies everyone. Greatly appreciate it. Some progress, but
now I am getting the following values when I don't use as.factor
13.14167 25.11667 28.34167 49.14167 40.39167 66.86667
Is that what you guys get?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Phil Spector
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of Something Something
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 5:28 PM
To: Phil Spector; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] lm function in R
Thanks for the replies everyone. Greatly
12 matches
Mail list logo