Re: [R] pearson correlation significant level

2013-05-17 Thread Jose Iparraguirre
Dear Elaine, One of the elements you obtain the P matrix, which is the matrix of asymptotic p-values. In your case, you get that the asymptotic p-value of the association between t_i and t_r is 0. That is, there would exist a perfect association (look also at the first result, the matrix of

Re: [R] pearson correlation significant level

2013-05-17 Thread Peter Ehlers
On 2013-05-17 08:37, Jose Iparraguirre wrote: Dear Elaine, One of the elements you obtain the P matrix, which is the matrix of asymptotic p-values. In your case, you get that the asymptotic p-value of the association between t_i and t_r is 0. That is, there would exist a perfect association

Re: [R] pearson correlation significant level

2013-05-17 Thread Don McKenzie
Just stating the obvious that Peter left unsaid: The OP calculated a matrix, whose diagonal is the correlations between each variable and itself, with the off-diagonal entries being the ones of interest. On 17-May-13, at 11:06 AM, Peter Ehlers wrote: On 2013-05-17 08:37, Jose Iparraguirre