Re: [R] rbenchmark: why is function benchmark back-quoted?

2013-10-08 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 08/10/2013 10:44 AM, Prof J C Nash (U30A) wrote: I'm wondering what the purpose of the back-quoting of the name is, since benchmark seems a valid name. The language reference does mention back-quoting names to make them syntactic names, but I found no explanation of the why. Can someone give

Re: [R] rbenchmark: why is function benchmark back-quoted?

2013-10-08 Thread Jeff Newmiller
Your use of the English language is failing to communicate. You mention the name when name is not a proper noun. Are you referring to some specific example? --- Jeff NewmillerThe .

Re: [R] rbenchmark: why is function benchmark back-quoted?

2013-10-08 Thread Prof J C Nash (U30A)
The function 'benchmark' which is the only one in package 'rbenchmark' has a back-quoted name in its first line `benchmark` - function( I wondered whether this had specific importance. It appears not. JN On 13-10-08 11:15 AM, Jeff Newmiller wrote: Your use of the English language is

Re: [R] rbenchmark: why is function benchmark back-quoted?

2013-10-08 Thread Yihui Xie
I think there are two possibilities: (1) package.skeleton() can produce this; (2) the package author prefers this style. Back-quoting is often unnecessary, unless the object name is not valid without back-quoting, e.g., `a b` - 1:2 ls() [1] a b a b Error: unexpected symbol in a b `a b` [1] 1