HI Jim,
This is great!! It is also tricky!!! The problem lies in the choice of
ylim. And looking at the data and choosing ylim based on the maximum and
minimum values of y is a waste of time. And choosing it by other means was
yet much more difficult.
I had to start plotting part of the data
Thanks Glenn.
I also favour restricting to sRGB<->HSV/HLS top remove ambiguity (so
there is no direct conversion RGB<->HSV/HLS).
This would also be consistent with grDevices::rgb2hsv().
Paul
On 23/06/18 13:43, Glenn Davis wrote:
Achim and Paul,
This is an entirely different subject -
Hullo Jim,
That's wonderful: thank you so much! That makes things even easier. There
are also no problems regarding getting rid of the function as each set of
computations occurs in a new Rstudio process: it's not optimal, but given
the problem it was the best solution. My code will just stick
Thank you for your reply.
At the moment, my colleague and her students are just using
zero-dimensional variables for output, no vectors or matrices, which does
make my life easier.
Since my code-glue parses through the scripts' code to substitute variables
as required, I could code a command to
No it isn't. Your stature is diminished by hateful behaviour.
Cheers, Mike
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, 07:26 Rolf Turner, wrote:
> On 25/06/18 12:03, Bert Gunter wrote:
> > Ted, et. al.:
> >
> > Re: "Data is" vs "data are" ... Heh heh!
> >
> > "This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will
Hi Simon,
Easy to do if you call "print" directly:
print<-function(x) cat(deparse(substitute(x)),"=\n",x,"\n")
y<-3
print(y)
y =
3
Obviously you will want to get rid of your print function when it is
not being used with "rm" or by starting a new session. Getting it to
bypass the default print
On 25/06/18 12:03, Bert Gunter wrote:
Ted, et. al.:
Re: "Data is" vs "data are" ... Heh heh!
"This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
(Attributed to Churchill in one form or another, likely wrongly.)
See here for some semi-authoritative dicussion:
On 06/24/2018 08:03 PM, Bert Gunter wrote:
> Ted, et. al.:
>
> Re: "Data is" vs "data are" ... Heh heh!
>
> "This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
> (Attributed to Churchill in one form or another, likely wrongly.)
>
> See here for some semi-authoritative
Ted, et. al.:
Re: "Data is" vs "data are" ... Heh heh!
"This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
(Attributed to Churchill in one form or another, likely wrongly.)
See here for some semi-authoritative dicussion:
Yes [1], though most people use it interactively, e.g.
?cat
?sprintf
[1] https://cran.r-project.org/manuals.html
On June 24, 2018 4:31:40 PM PDT, Simon Ellis wrote:
>Thank you for your reply.
>
>At the moment, my colleague and her students are just using
>zero-dimensional variables for output,
On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 09:46 +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
> Does/should one say "the degrees of freedom is defined to be" or "the
> degrees of freedom are defined to be"?
>
> Although value of "degrees of freedom" is a single number, the first
> formulation sounds very odd to my ear.
>
> I would
(I suspect there will be much disagreement about "is" vs. "are".)
I'd say something like "the parameter degrees of freedom is defined to
be ..."
---JRG
On 06/24/2018 05:46 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> Does/should one say "the degrees of freedom is defined to be" or "the
> degrees of freedom
I would use "the number of degrees of freedom is defined... ".
Peter
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 2:46 PM Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>
> Does/should one say "the degrees of freedom is defined to be" or "the
> degrees of freedom are defined to be"?
>
> Although value of "degrees of freedom" is a single
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 14:46, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>
> Does/should one say "the degrees of freedom is defined to be" or "the
> degrees of freedom are defined to be"?
"are", the noun in your statement is "degrees", while the fragment "of
freedom" acts as an adjective, narrowing the scope of the
On 24/06/2018 5:46 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Does/should one say "the degrees of freedom is defined to be" or "the
degrees of freedom are defined to be"?
Although value of "degrees of freedom" is a single number, the first
formulation sounds very odd to my ear.
I would like to call upon the
Does/should one say "the degrees of freedom is defined to be" or "the
degrees of freedom are defined to be"?
Although value of "degrees of freedom" is a single number, the first
formulation sounds very odd to my ear.
I would like to call upon the collective wisdom of the R community to
Estimado Manuel
Justo ahora estoy trabajando en un proceso automatizado con código, pero la
mayoría de las veces tengo ciento de líneas donde mucho es copiar y pegar
más la modificación de una o dos palabras, podría ser un proceso que se
ejecute según criterios hasta la condición, pero la verdad
Hi Ogbos,
The problem is almost certainly with the data. I get the plot I expect
with the sample data that you first posted, so I know that the code
works. If you try thIs what do you get?
oodf<-read.table(text="S/N AB
1-5 64833
2-4 95864
3-3 82322
4-2 95591
5
Hola,
En cada iteración de tu bucle, puedes:
- Cambiar la matriz a data.frame.
- Nombrar las columnas incluyendo si quieres el número de la iteración
del bucle (tu "i").
- Esto lo puedes hacer utiizando la función "paste()".
- No sé si los nombres de las variables, en cada
Yes and no. R does not have a "Matlab-output-compatibility" mode, but you can
write your script to output anything you want it to using the "cat" function
with various functions like "sprintf" and "as.character". You may want to write
some functions that format some common objects that you
You cannot send one task to 12 processors... the price of parallelism is that
you must break down your task into smaller tasks. Once you have number of tasks
equal to our more than the number of available cores then the higher level
functions such as parLapply or mclapply can shuffle tasks onto
Hullo,
I'm writing a piece of scripting glue for a colleague who is doing
computations in several different languages. (It's the most convenient way,
right now.) My system calls the relevant program (e.g. Rstudio, MATLAB)
with a path to a script, captures stdout and parses it for output
Gracias Javier, pero creo que si no consigo que me lo haga todo de una
vez con un loop, me merece más la pena hacerlo como hasta ahora, una a
una.
Manuel
Quoting Javier Marcuzzi :
Estimado Manuel Mendoza
No sería lo ideal, pero de pronto podría ir guardando en json, que es una
forma
Hi Jim
Thanks again for returning to this.
please not that the line "oomean<-as.vector(by(oodf$B,oodf$A,mean))" was
omitted (not sure whether deliberate) after you introduced the standard
error function.
When I used it, empty plot window with the correct axes were generated but
no data was
Hi Ogbos,
If I use the example data that you sent, I get the error after this line:
oose<-as.vector(by(oodf$B,oodf$A,std.error))
Error in FUN(X[[i]], ...) : object 'std.error' not found
The reason is that you have not defined std.error as a function, but
as the result of a calculation. When I
25 matches
Mail list logo
