Re: [R] traceback performs differently in "interactive-mode" then in "script-mode"

Hi Malte, I think I asked the same question on Stack Overflow ten years ago: https://stackoverflow.com/q/13116099/559676 I hope you'll find the answer helpful there. Regards, Yihui -- https://yihui.org On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 6:19 AM Flender, Malte wrote: > Hello, > > a few days ago I

Re: [R] [External] Amazing AI

On 12/21/22 7:50 AM, Barry Rowlingson wrote: Next year one of my R programming assigments will read like this: "Here is some R code written by a multi-million dollar AI system to compute [something]. It doesn't work. Fix the bugs, then ask the AI to write a letter to its creators apologising

Re: [R] [External] Amazing AI

Next year one of my R programming assigments will read like this: "Here is some R code written by a multi-million dollar AI system to compute [something]. It doesn't work. Fix the bugs, then ask the AI to write a letter to its creators apologising for how rubbish it is at coding. Collect one

[R] traceback performs differently in "interactive-mode" then in "script-mode"

Hello, a few days ago I encountered a strange behavior of base R. I'm not really sure if it is a bug or not. Thus I am somewhat hesitant to write a bug report. Instead I write to R-Help to ask you if this behavior can be considered a bug or not. I started with a question at stackoverflow

Re: [R] Integer division

> Richard O'Keefe > on Wed, 21 Dec 2022 16:44:51 +1300 writes: > Lack of consensus: I should mention Python's // operator, > which does flooring division. I should mention Common > Lisp, where (floor - -), (ceiling - -), (round - -), and > (truncate - -) all return a