]
Inviato: venerd� 21 novembre 2014 15:37
A: Michael Dewey; Mario Petretta;
https://inbox.unina.it/horde/imp/message.php?mailbox=INBOXindex=101432
r-help@r-project.org
Oggetto: RE: [R] Comparing summary hazard ratios in meta-analysis
Those hazard ratios and CIs seem a bit strange. On the log-scale
Dear all,
I use R 3.1.1 for Windows.
I performed two different meta-analysis assessing the prognostic value of
two different tests in patients with coronary artery disease. The study
included in the two analysis are different.
The variable of interest in dichotomous (normal/abnormal result) for
On 21/11/2014 08:51, Mario Petretta wrote:
Dear all,
I use R 3.1.1 for Windows.
I performed two different meta-analysis assessing the prognostic value of
two different tests in patients with coronary artery disease. The study
included in the two analysis are different.
That makes life
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Dewey
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 13:25
To: Mario Petretta; r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Comparing summary hazard ratios in meta-analysis
On 21/11/2014 08:51
Petretta; r-help@r-project.org
Oggetto: RE: [R] Comparing summary hazard ratios in meta-analysis
Those hazard ratios and CIs seem a bit strange. On the log-scale, they should
be symmetric, but they are not. Could be due to heavy rounding though. At any
rate, it comes down to this:
hr- c(3.12, 1.15
5 matches
Mail list logo
