Re: [R] Function recommendation for this study...

iption of your >> study sounds like a classical >> categorical observer agreement problem. I can't give >> a reference off the top of my head, but if you get >> stuck, e-mail me and I'll try and find a ref to get you started. >> >> Murray M Cooper,

Re: [R] Function recommendation for this study...

ement problem. I can't give a reference off the top of my head, but if you get stuck, e-mail me and I'll try and find a ref to get you started. Murray M Cooper, Ph.D. Richland Statistics 9800 N 24th St Richland, MI, USA 49083 Mail: richs...@earthlink.net - Original Message - From: &q

Re: [R] Function recommendation for this study...

urray M Cooper, Ph.D. Richland Statistics 9800 N 24th St Richland, MI, USA 49083 Mail: richs...@earthlink.net - Original Message - From: "Paul Heinrich Dietrich" To: Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:25 AM Subject: [R] Function recommendation for this study... Hi, I'm not

[R] Function recommendation for this study...

Hi, I'm not used to thinking along these lines, and wanted to ask your advice: Suppose you have a sample of around 100, consisting of patients according to doctors, in which patients and doctors are given a questionnaire with categorical responses. Each patient somehow has roughly 3 doctors, or