Re: [R] Minor warning about seq

2010-12-02 Thread Carl Witthoft
I believe the R intro manual and R-inferno have some pretty stern warnings about never using 'c' or 't' as variable names, for obvious reasons. Similarly, I nearly crushed some code once by writing a nice little function to find the mode of a data set and calling the function mode() .

Re: [R] Minor warning about seq

2010-12-01 Thread Dieter Menne
Prof. John C Nash wrote: I spent more time than I should have debugging a script because I wanted x-seq(0,100)*0.1 but typed x-seq(O:100)*0.1 seq(0:100) yields 1 to 101, Which leads us to another rule: never use a variable called O. I remember this was a no-no even in my

Re: [R] Minor warning about seq

2010-12-01 Thread Ray Brownrigg
I think both responses so far have missed the point, (assuming the O was a typo for zero). That is: seq(0:1) [1] 1 2 when seq(0,1) [1] 0 1 was intended. Ray Brownrigg On Wed, 01 Dec 2010, Ista Zahn wrote: So you are warning us that you must type zero instead of the letter O when we want to

[R] Minor warning about seq

2010-11-30 Thread Prof. John C Nash
I spent more time than I should have debugging a script because I wanted x-seq(0,100)*0.1 but typed x-seq(O:100)*0.1 seq(0:100) yields 1 to 101, Clearly my own brain to fingers fumble, but possibly one others may want to avoid it. JN __

Re: [R] Minor warning about seq

2010-11-30 Thread Ista Zahn
So you are warning us that you must type zero instead of the letter O when we want to enter the value of zero? Seems pretty obvious... -Ista On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Prof. John C Nash nas...@uottawa.ca wrote: I spent more time than I should have debugging a script because I wanted