Re: [R] Time for a companion mailing list for R packages?

2022-01-13 Thread Tom Woolman
I concur on both of Eric's suggestions below. I love R but I couldn't imagine using it on a daily basis without "key" packages for various regression and classification modeling problems, etc. Likewise on being able to embed images (within reason... maybe establish a max KB or MB file size

Re: [R] Time for a companion mailing list for R packages?

2022-01-13 Thread Eric Berger
Re: constructive criticism to make this list more useful to more people: Suggestion 1: accommodate questions related to non-base-R packages This has been addressed by many already. The current de facto situation is that such questions are asked and often answered. Perhaps

Re: [R] Time for a companion mailing list for R packages?

2022-01-13 Thread John Fox
Dear Avi et al., Rather than proliferating R mailing lists, why not just allow questions on non-standard packages on the r-help list? (1) If people don't want to answer these questions, they don't have to. (2) Users won't necessarily find the new email list and so may post to r-help anyway,

Re: [R] Time for a companion mailing list for R packages?

2022-01-12 Thread Jeff Newmiller
TL;DR The people responsible for tidyverse don't think much of mailing lists. IANAMLA (I am not mailing list admin) and I know some people get kind of heated about these things, but my take is that this list _is_ about R so to be on topic the question needs to be about R and how to get things

[R] Time for a companion mailing list for R packages?

2022-01-12 Thread Avi Gross via R-help
Respectfully, this forum gets lots of questions that include non-base R components and especially packages in the tidyverse. Like it or not, the extended R language is far more useful and interesting for many people and especially those who do not wish to constantly reinvent the wheel. And