Dear List,
I've just tried to specify a GAM without an intercept -- I've got one of
the (rare) cases where it is appropriate for E(y) - 0 as X -0.
Naively running a GAM with the -1 appended to the formula and the
calling predict.gam, I see that the model isn't behaving as expected.
I don't
please deleter this thread -- wrong title
On 04/16/2013 02:35 PM, Andrew Crane-Droesch wrote:
Dear List,
I've just tried to specify a GAM without an intercept -- I've got one
of the (rare) cases where it is appropriate for E(y) - 0 as X -0.
Naively running a GAM with the -1 appended to the
2 matches
Mail list logo