On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:29 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote:
Rolf Turner wrote:
On 15/02/2010, at 9:40 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote
SNIP
(In response to some advice from David Winsemius):
I am quite certain that this is the most elaborately worded
version of
RTFM I have ever come across.
I
Hello,
When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a
quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive.
I have tried to study
library(lattice)
panel.barchart
but am unable to figure out where ylim is taken care of and how one
On Feb 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote:
Hello,
When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 -
bars for a
quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive.
I have tried to study
library(lattice)
panel.barchart
but am
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Johannes Graumann
johannes_graum...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a
quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive.
I have tried to study
library(lattice)
David Winsemius wrote:
On Feb 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote:
Hello,
When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 -
bars for a
quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive.
I have tried to study
library(lattice)
Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Johannes Graumann
johannes_graum...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars
for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite
non-intuitive.
I have tried to study
On Feb 14, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Johannes Graumann wrote:
David Winsemius wrote:
On Feb 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote:
Hello,
When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 -
bars for a
quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-
intuitive.
On 15/02/2010, at 9:40 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote
SNIP
(In response to some advice from David Winsemius):
I am quite certain that this is the most elaborately worded version of
RTFM I have ever come across.
I nominate this as a fortune. (Despite Prof. Winsemius's later
Rolf Turner wrote:
On 15/02/2010, at 9:40 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote
SNIP
(In response to some advice from David Winsemius):
I am quite certain that this is the most elaborately worded version of
RTFM I have ever come across.
I nominate this as a fortune. (Despite Prof.
9 matches
Mail list logo