Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-15 Thread David Winsemius
On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:29 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote: Rolf Turner wrote: On 15/02/2010, at 9:40 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote SNIP (In response to some advice from David Winsemius): I am quite certain that this is the most elaborately worded version of RTFM I have ever come across. I

[R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread Johannes Graumann
Hello, When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive. I have tried to study library(lattice) panel.barchart but am unable to figure out where ylim is taken care of and how one

Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread David Winsemius
On Feb 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote: Hello, When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive. I have tried to study library(lattice) panel.barchart but am

Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Johannes Graumann johannes_graum...@web.de wrote: Hello, When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive. I have tried to study         library(lattice)        

Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread Johannes Graumann
David Winsemius wrote: On Feb 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote: Hello, When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive. I have tried to study library(lattice)

Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread Johannes Graumann
Deepayan Sarkar wrote: On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Johannes Graumann johannes_graum...@web.de wrote: Hello, When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non-intuitive. I have tried to study

Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread David Winsemius
On Feb 14, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Johannes Graumann wrote: David Winsemius wrote: On Feb 14, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote: Hello, When drawing barcharts, I find it not helpful if ylim[1] != 0 - bars for a quantity of 0, that do not show a length of 0 are quite non- intuitive.

Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread Rolf Turner
On 15/02/2010, at 9:40 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote SNIP (In response to some advice from David Winsemius): I am quite certain that this is the most elaborately worded version of RTFM I have ever come across. I nominate this as a fortune. (Despite Prof. Winsemius's later

Re: [R] lattice/ylim: how to fix ylim[1], but have ylim[2] dynamically calculated?

2010-02-14 Thread Johannes Graumann
Rolf Turner wrote: On 15/02/2010, at 9:40 AM, Johannes Graumann wrote SNIP (In response to some advice from David Winsemius): I am quite certain that this is the most elaborately worded version of RTFM I have ever come across. I nominate this as a fortune. (Despite Prof.