At 00:56 09/05/2008, Ted Harding wrote:
I'd like to thank Paul Johnson and Achim Zeileis heartily
for their thorough and accurate responses to my query.
I think that the details og how to use the procedure, and
of its variants, which they have sent to the list should
be definitive -- and very
The below is an old thread:
On 02-Jun-04 10:52:29, Lutz Ph. Breitling wrote:
Dear all,
i am trying to redo the 'eyestudy' analysis presented on the site
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/relative_risk.htm
with R (1.9.0), with special interest in the section on relative
risk estimation
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Ted Harding
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The below is an old thread:
On 02-Jun-04 10:52:29, Lutz Ph. Breitling wrote:
Dear all,
i am trying to redo the 'eyestudy' analysis presented on the site
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/faq/relative_risk.htm
Ted Harding said:
I can get the estimated RRs from
RRs - exp(summary(GLM)$coef[,1])
but do not see how to implement confidence intervals based
on robust error variances using the output in GLM.
Thanks for the link to the data. Here's my best guess. If you use
the following approach,
Paul Ted:
I can get the estimated RRs from
RRs - exp(summary(GLM)$coef[,1])
but do not see how to implement confidence intervals based
on robust error variances using the output in GLM.
Thanks for the link to the data. Here's my best guess. If you use
the following approach,
Once again, Paul, many thanks for your thorough examination
of this question! And for spelling out your approach!!!
It certainly looks as though you're very close to target
(or even spot-on).
I've only one comment -- see at end.
On 08-May-08 20:35:38, Paul Johnson wrote:
Ted Harding said:
I
I'd like to thank Paul Johnson and Achim Zeileis heartily
for their thorough and accurate responses to my query.
I think that the details og how to use the procedure, and
of its variants, which they have sent to the list should
be definitive -- and very helpfully usable -- for folks
like myself
7 matches
Mail list logo
