I works, great !
So using your code, we can define 'as','as-' and 'is' with setIt. Is
there still any interest using setAs ?
Christophe
It seems to me your problem here is simply that you did not define a
coerce cal in setIs, so it does not know how to turn a C object into a
B object,
CG == Christophe Genolini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:42:09 +0100 writes:
CG I works, great !
CG So using your code, we can define 'as','as-' and 'is' with setIt. Is
CG there still any interest using setAs ?
Well, ?setIs contains
This function establishes
Hi the list
I am fighting with the twins setAs and setIs...
Here are some questions and comments (comments to myself but that migth
be wrong, it is why I am posting them)
1. Very surprising : using setIs define 'is', 'as-' but not 'as' ???
2. Using setAs define 'as', 'as-' but not 'is'...
What
On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Hi the list
I am fighting with the twins setAs and setIs...
Here are some questions and comments (comments to myself but that
migth
be wrong, it is why I am posting them)
1. Very surprising : using setIs define 'is', 'as-' but not
4 matches
Mail list logo