some, may be better
off spending the money to hire someone and I assume there are places they can
be directed.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Lemon
To: Avi Gross
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Sent: Sun, Feb 27, 2022 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: [R] tidying up
Hi Avi,
I just sent in an an
For those wishing to make changes to r-help or seeking info on the R
mailing lists in general, please consult:
https://www.r-project.org/mail.html You may wish to cc Martin
Maechler on any proposals for change, as he is one of the maintainers
-- or at least can contact the maintainers -- of
FWIW my brief answer to your brief question is "of course" it is okay. The real
problem however are the questions that can only be answered by people with
detailed understanding of non-R-related issues, such as the workings of the
custom interactive graphics device used by RStudio or the broken
To: Avi Gross
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Sent: Sun, Feb 27, 2022 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: [R] tidying up
Hi Avi,
I just sent in an answer to a very simple question. In many cases it
seems to me that the real problem isn't apparent from the request.
ektaraK appears to have almost no experience with R
Hi Avi,
I just sent in an answer to a very simple question. In many cases it
seems to me that the real problem isn't apparent from the request.
ektaraK appears to have almost no experience with R (sorry if I'm
wrong). A person in this position may sort of know what they want to
do but do not know
This mailing list seems to steadily get messages that some see as not relevant
to this forum. In particular, some see it as wrong to bring up some things here
and keep reminding people of some ground rules.
So I want to know, briefly, if it is reasonable to ask a person with a question
or
On 28/08/2008 10:46 AM, Marie Pierre Sylvestre wrote:
Dear R users,
I am currently writing a R package and to do so I am following the
guidelines in manual 'Writing R extensions'.
In Section 3.1, it is suggested to tidy up the code using a file
containing the following:
options(keep.source =
DM == Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:36:12 -0400 writes:
DM On 28/08/2008 10:46 AM, Marie Pierre Sylvestre wrote:
Dear R users,
I am currently writing a R package and to do so I am following the
guidelines in manual 'Writing R extensions'.
Martin Maechler wrote:
I strongly agree with your last paragraph,
and I have always thought that we should recommend using
R-aware editors rather than dump() nowadays ...
but then I thought that I've been biased at all times, being a
co-developer of ESS, authoring its M-x
Dear R users,
I am currently writing a R package and to do so I am following the
guidelines in manual 'Writing R extensions'.
In Section 3.1, it is suggested to tidy up the code using a file
containing the following:
options(keep.source = FALSE)
source(myfuns..R)
dump(ls(all = TRUE), file =
On 28/08/2008 10:46 AM, Marie Pierre Sylvestre wrote:
Dear R users,
I am currently writing a R package and to do so I am following the
guidelines in manual 'Writing R extensions'.
In Section 3.1, it is suggested to tidy up the code using a file
containing the following:
options(keep.source =
11 matches
Mail list logo
