Re: [R] help with heatmap - how to remove annoying X before numeric values?

2007-07-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
read.table('temp.txt', check.names = FALSE) would be easier (and more general, since make.names can do more than prepend an 'X'). On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Moshe Olshansky wrote: Hi Suzanne, My solution (which I am sure is not the best) would be: heat - read.table('temp.txt') heat

Re: [R] memory error with 64-bit R in linux

2007-07-18 Thread zhihua li
Thanks for replying! i don't think i'm paging. i tried to use a smaller version of my matrix and do all the checkings as suggested by jim. The smaller matrix caused another problem, for which I've opened another thread. But i've found something about memory that I don't understand. gc()

Re: [R] help with heatmap - how to remove annoying X before numeric values?

2007-07-18 Thread Moshe Olshansky
I was right saying that my solution was not the best possible! --- Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: read.table('temp.txt', check.names = FALSE) would be easier (and more general, since make.names can do more than prepend an 'X'). On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Moshe Olshansky wrote:

[R] Error: evaluation nested too deeply when doing heatmap with binary distfunction

2007-07-18 Thread zhihua li
Hi netters, I have a matrix X of the size (1000,100). The values are from -3 to +3. When I tried heatmap(X, distfun=function(c),dist(c,method=bin),hclustfun=function(m),hclust(m,method=average)) I got the error message: Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion /

Re: [R] memory error with 64-bit R in linux

2007-07-18 Thread jim holtman
The output from gc() indicates that you had a maximum usage of 476MB+119MB=~600MB. If you look at the output of ps you will notice that the process size is 523MB (or about 500MB if you want to be exact). So you are using about 25% of the 2GB that you have available. mem.limit just shows the

<    1   2