I am one of only 5 or 6 people in my organization making the
effort to include R/Splus as an analysis tool in everyday work -
the rest of my colleagues use SAS exclusively.
Today, one of them made the assertion that he believes the
numerical algorithms in SAS are superior to those in Splus
and R
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 08:34, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 14:50:25 -0400
Paul, David A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am one of only 5 or 6 people in my organization making the
effort to include R/Splus as an analysis tool in everyday work -
the rest of my colleagues use
Paul, David A wrote:
I am one of only 5 or 6 people in my organization making the
effort to include R/Splus as an analysis tool in everyday work -
the rest of my colleagues use SAS exclusively.
Today, one of them made the assertion that he believes the
numerical algorithms in SAS are superior to
Paul, David A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am one of only 5 or 6 people in my organization making the
effort to include R/Splus as an analysis tool in everyday work -
the rest of my colleagues use SAS exclusively.
Today, one of them made the assertion that he believes the
numerical
Douglas Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
McCullough, B. D. (1998), Assessing the reliability of statistical
software: Part I, The American Statistician, 52, 149-159.
McCullough, B. D. (1999), Assessing the reliability of statistical
software: Part II, The American Statistician, 53,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Paul, David A wrote:
I am one of only 5 or 6 people in my organization making the
effort to include R/Splus as an analysis tool in everyday work -
the rest of my colleagues use SAS exclusively.
Today, one of them made the assertion that he believes the
numerical
My thanks to Drs. Armstrong, Bates, Harrell, Liaw, Lumley,
Prager, Schwartz, and Mr. Wang for their replies. I have
pasted my original message and their replies below.
After viewing http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd/ as suggested
by Dr. Schwartz, it occurred to me that it might be educational
