[R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Ali -
Assume we have a function like: foo - function(x, y) how is it possible to define a binary indexing operator, denoted by $, so that x$y functions the same as foo(x, y) __ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list

RE: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Huntsinger, Reid
Huntsinger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ali - Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:11 PM To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] Defining binary indexing operators Assume we have a function like: foo - function(x, y) how is it possible

RE: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Huntsinger, Reid
, Reid Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:10 PM To: 'Ali -'; r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: RE: [R] Defining binary indexing operators That sounds like a recipe for headaches. If you want to use x$y because you want a certain kind of x to act like a list with components for certain y, then you

Re: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 4/27/05, Ali - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assume we have a function like: foo - function(x, y) how is it possible to define a binary indexing operator, denoted by $, so that x$y functions the same as foo(x, y) Here is an example. Note that $ does not evaluate y so you have

Re: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Tony Plate
It's not necessary to be that complicated, is it? AFAIK, the '$' operator is treated specially by the parser so that its RHS is treated as a string, not a variable name. Hence, a method for $ can just take the indexing argument directly as given -- no need for any fancy language tricks

Re: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Ali -
Assume we have a function like: foo - function(x, y) how is it possible to define a binary indexing operator, denoted by $, so that x$y functions the same as foo(x, y) Here is an example. Note that $ does not evaluate y so you have to do it yourself: x - structure(3, class =

Re: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Tony Plate
Excuse me! I misunderstood the question, and indeed, it is necessary be that complicated when you try to make x$y behave the same as foo(x,y), rather than foo(x,y) (doing the former would be inadvisible, as I think someelse pointed out too.) Tony Plate wrote: It's not necessary to be that

Re: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 4/27/05, Ali - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Assume we have a function like: foo - function(x, y) how is it possible to define a binary indexing operator, denoted by $, so that x$y functions the same as foo(x, y) Here is an example. Note that $ does

Re: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Ali -
Here is an example. Note that $ does not evaluate y so you have to do it yourself: x - structure(3, class = myclass) y - 5 foo - function(x,y) x+y $.myclass - function(x, i) { i - eval.parent(parse(text=i)); foo(x, i) } x$y # structure(8, class = myclass) If I got it right, in the

Re: [R] Defining binary indexing operators

2005-04-27 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 4/27/05, Ali - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is an example. Note that $ does not evaluate y so you have to do it yourself: x - structure(3, class = myclass) y - 5 foo - function(x,y) x+y $.myclass - function(x, i) { i - eval.parent(parse(text=i)); foo(x, i)