On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jason Liao wrote:
Thanks for Prof. Ripley and Andy for your technical explantion. It
seems that that the real CPU speed has not advanced as fast as these
Ghz or other performance indicator suggest.
Yes, my program is totally CPU intensive.
It may not be even if you
I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13 Ghz. I heard
that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point capacity. So I bought a
Athlon 2200+ laptop yesterday. I expected that new Athlon 2200+ will be
twice as fast as the P III 1.13 GB. I ran a R simulation program and
the new computer
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jason Liao wrote:
I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13 Ghz. I heard
that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point capacity. So I bought a
Athlon 2200+ laptop yesterday. I expected that new Athlon 2200+ will be
twice as fast as the P III 1.13 GB. I ran
] Dismal R performance of Athlon moble CPU?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jason Liao wrote:
I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13
Ghz. I heard
that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point capacity. So
I bought a
Athlon 2200+ laptop yesterday. I expected that new
Jason Liao [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
R can not really use dual CPU for one R session if I understand
correctly
It certainly can, using message passing libraries or sockets. While
it isn't technically one session, it's awfully similar to that, for
the user.
best,
-tony
--
A.J. Rossini /
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] Dismal R performance of Athlon moble CPU?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jason Liao wrote:
I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13
Ghz. I heard
that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point capacity. So
I bought a
Athlon 2200
Liao
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] Dismal R performance of Athlon moble CPU?
I have been using a laptop computer of Pentium III 1.13 Ghz.
I heard that AMD's Athlon has excellent floating point
capacity. So I bought a Athlon 2200+ laptop yesterday