There is a problem with this scheme that has nothing to do with
syntax. Extending objects dynamically like this is probably the
surest way to run out of memory. If you know the final length an
object will be, then it is best to create the object at its full length
and then subscript into it with
On Friday 02 April 2004 04:52 pm, you wrote:
>> I believe this should be an easy thing to do...
>>
>> I have a function I repeatably call which takes input parameters and
>> outputs columns to various data frames. I also wish to keep a summary
>> of
>> certain values as I call the function. I thou
>Marko,
>Looks fine to me. Why do you think the syntax is incorrect? Works for me in
>1.8 on Windows.
> I have a function I repeatably call which takes input parameters and
> outputs columns to various data frames.
Looks fine to me although it is not completely clear that your request for
column
] On Behalf Of Mark O. Kimball
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 4:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] Extending a vector
I believe this should be an easy thing to do...
I have a function I repeatably call which takes input parameters and
outputs columns to various data frames. I also wish to ke
I believe this should be an easy thing to do...
I have a function I repeatably call which takes input parameters and
outputs columns to various data frames. I also wish to keep a summary of
certain values as I call the function. I though keeping the values in a
vector then appending the vector by
