On Wed, 27-Aug-2003 at 01:40PM -0400, Alvaro Muñoz wrote:
| Drs. Harrell and O'Keefe,
|
|
|
| Thank you for your suggestions.
|
| Although it is at odds with your beliefs, University staff working
| on licensing and technology transfer believe that a patent may be a
| vehicle to achieve a
My reaction when learning of a proposed patent on a new graph was: oh
well, that's something I can forget about. Without a patent, code would
have been available in R in a very short period of time, the statistical
community would have been able to play around with it, see how it worked
on
I have been reading this discussion (or debate, depends on your point of
view) with great interest in the last few days.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, David Scott wrote:
My reaction when learning of a proposed patent on a new graph was: oh
well, that's something I can forget about. Without a patent,
David Scott wrote:
but if any of us are to do
likewise I guess we will either pay up or secretly write code and play
around with diamond graphs while hidden in the basement.
Okay, lets stand up and be counted: who has been writing diamond graph
code? Mine's 60 lines.
Like others I welcome the
