Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 12:17 PM
To: Cody Hamilton
Cc: Thomas Lumley; r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Regulatory Compliance and Validation Issues
Cody Hamilton wrote:
> Dear Thomas,
>
> Thank you for your reply. You are of course quite right - the R
Foundation couldn
omas Lumley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 8:50 AM
> To: Cody Hamilton
> Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [R] Regulatory Compliance and Validation Issues
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Cody Hamilton wrote:
>
>
>> I have a few specific comm
t: Sunday, August 19, 2007 8:50 AM
To: Cody Hamilton
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] Regulatory Compliance and Validation Issues
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Cody Hamilton wrote:
> I have a few specific comments/questions that I would like to present to
> the R help list.
> 2.
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Cody Hamilton wrote:
> I have a few specific comments/questions that I would like to present to
> the R help list.
> 2. While the document's scope is limited to base R plus recommended
> packages, I believe most companies will need access to functionalities
> provided by
As I work as a biostatistician in the medical devices industry, I have been
very happy to take part in several conversations on this list regarding the use
of R in a regulated environment. It was with great interest, therefore, that I
read the new guidance document for the use of R in regulated