Re: [R] Simple question about function with glm

2007-05-06 Thread Chung-hong Chan
Thank you akk. I know it is not statistically sounded to check the distribution of response before glm. I will check the distribution of xmodel$residuals later on. About the program problem. It can print summary(xmodel) but not confint(xmodel) by amending my code as suggested by Bill Venables. R

Re: [R] Simple question about function with glm

2007-05-06 Thread Ben Bolker
csiro.au> writes: > > Finally, I'm a bit puzzled why you use glm() when the simpler lm() would > have done the job. You are fitting a linear model and do not need the > extra paraphernaila that generalized linear models require. > > Bill Venables. > Perhaps the original poster is confuse

Re: [R] Simple question about function with glm

2007-05-06 Thread Bill.Venables
ECTED] On Behalf Of Chung-hong Chan Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2007 6:47 PM To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] Simple question about function with glm Dear all, I coded a function called u.glm u.glm <- function (x,ahi,age,bmiz,gender) { library(nortest) lil.rslt <- lillie.

[R] Simple question about function with glm

2007-05-06 Thread Chung-hong Chan
Dear all, I coded a function called u.glm u.glm <- function (x,ahi,age,bmiz,gender) { library(nortest) lil.rslt <- lillie.test(x) if (lil.rslt$p.value >0.05) { cat("Logtrans=0, lillie=",lil.rslt$p.value,"\n")