On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 06:55:26PM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Göran Broström wrote:
I'm looking for a Windows distribution of TeX that works with R, after a
few years' absence from Windows. On Duncan Murdoch's Rtools page fptex is
still recommended, but it turns out that fptex is defunct
I'm looking for a Windows distribution of TeX that works with R, after a
few years' absence from Windows. On Duncan Murdoch's Rtools page fptex is
still recommended, but it turns out that fptex is defunct as of May 2005,
see
http://www.metz.supelec.fr/~popineau/xemtex-7.html
So, what is
With my windows installation, MikTeX works fine, without any problem
in compiling packages documentation.
Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo.
2005/9/5, Göran Broström [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm looking for a Windows distribution of TeX that works with R, after a
few years' absence from Windows. On Duncan
Hi,
Göran Broström wrote:
So, what is suggested? TUG (tug.org) recommends something called proTeXt,
which is said to be based on MiKTeX, for Windows users. Since MikTeX
could be used with R, that sounds like a good alternative.
Any comments to that?
I've been using MikTeX on Windows for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a Windows distribution of TeX that works with R,
after a few years' absence from Windows. On Duncan Murdoch's Rtools
page fptex is still recommended, but it turns out that fptex is
defunct as of May 2005,
see
Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Miktex can be used with WinEDT, Emacs, Texniccenter and others as editor.
Slightly off topic, if you want to get MikTeX working with Emacs and
ESS, the Claus Dethlefsen has a wonderful web site (in fact, best
website on this topic IMHO)
On 9/5/05, Göran Broström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a Windows distribution of TeX that works with R, after a
few years' absence from Windows. On Duncan Murdoch's Rtools page fptex is
still recommended, but it turns out that fptex is defunct as of May 2005,
see
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 12:07:21AM +1000, Ko-Kang Kevin Wang wrote:
Slightly off topic, if you want to get MikTeX working with Emacs and
ESS, the Claus Dethlefsen has a wonderful web site (in fact, best
website on this topic IMHO) http://www.math.auc.dk/~dethlef/Tips/
Thanks for that tips,
Goran wrote
The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt.
Thanks for all the input.
Well, nothing against MikTeX, but ProteXt also works fine with R.
Peter
Peter L. Flom, PhD
Assistant Director, Statistics and Data Analysis Core
Center for Drug Use and HIV Research
Goran wrote
The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt.
Thanks for all the input.
Just to clarify, I have never used proTeXt and my comment was based
on having used fptex and MiKTeX and the fact that the batchfiles distribution
provides specific additional R
On 9/5/05, Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goran wrote
The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt.
Thanks for all the input.
Just to clarify, I have never used proTeXt and my comment was based
on having used fptex and MiKTeX and the fact that
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:55:39PM -0400, Peter Flom wrote:
Goran wrote
The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt.
Thanks for all the input.
Well, nothing against MikTeX, but ProteXt also works fine with R.
I have made some studying; it seems as if proTeXt
On 9/5/05, Göran Broström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:55:39PM -0400, Peter Flom wrote:
Goran wrote
The consensus (so far) seems to be to stick to MikTeX and skip proTeXt.
Thanks for all the input.
Well, nothing against MikTeX, but ProteXt also works fine
Göran Broström wrote:
I'm looking for a Windows distribution of TeX that works with R, after a
few years' absence from Windows. On Duncan Murdoch's Rtools page fptex is
still recommended, but it turns out that fptex is defunct as of May 2005,
see
14 matches
Mail list logo
