Roger D. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc R. Feldesman wrote:
I agree with you on the flood of messages lately. Often this
flood accompanies a new release, but this flood has continued
unabated for longer than I would have imagined. The good news is
that R is becoming more popular and
At 12:28 PM 3/17/2004, Ed L Cashin wrote:
I hope this response isn't indicative of the speed with which gmane posts
messages. I think this entire thread was more than 7 or 8 months ago,
possibly longer.
Roger D. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc R. Feldesman wrote:
I agree with you on
Marc R. Feldesman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12:28 PM 3/17/2004, Ed L Cashin wrote:
I hope this response isn't indicative of the speed with which gmane
posts messages. I think this entire thread was more than 7 or 8
months ago, possibly longer.
Your hopes are fulfilled. The reason is
I probably shouldn't suggest this, because I can't volunteer to implement
it. However, I bring it up in the hopes that if (1) others agree and (2)
the R core group think it a good idea that a suitable volunteer will come
forward.
I am finding that the flood of R email messages is becoming
At 07:17 AM 5/30/2003, Mike Prager wrote:
I probably shouldn't suggest this, because I can't volunteer to implement
it. However, I bring it up in the hopes that if (1) others agree and (2)
the R core group think it a good idea that a suitable volunteer will come
forward.
I am finding that the
Mike Prager [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am finding that the flood of R email messages is becoming difficult
to deal with, even using filters, etc., in my email client. Would we
be better served by establishing a Usenet newsgroup? Would that be
practical or impractical? Would it create
Actually, check the archives about a year ago when this was brought up and the
associated
problems. Ranging from spam harvesters, copyright and the like.
Best, MEH
--
Mark Hall
Niigata Prefectural Museum of History
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
