hadley wickham wrote:
>> I think that is likely true but it would at least mean that they had
>> seen it repeatedly and there would really be no excuse for not following it
>> (unlike the current situation where one needs to take action to follow
>> the posting guide link and then read a lengthy
> - The "inscription" page is dynamically generated by mailman, i.e.,
> typically python scripts.
> If any of you are interested in patching Mailman's sources in
> a reasonable way (i.e. easily reproducible for the next
> version of mailman), I'd consider a change there; otherwise not.
The
Thanks to Gabor, Spencer, and Hadley,
for the constructive propositions.
> "hadley" == hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:39:36 +0100 writes:
>> I think that is likely true but it would at least mean that they had
>> seen it repeatedly and there would
> I think that is likely true but it would at least mean that they had
> seen it repeatedly and there would really be no excuse for not following it
> (unlike the current situation where one needs to take action to follow
> the posting guide link and then read a lengthy page).
Logically, that make
On 7/16/06, hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They might read it when reading other people's messages since
> > it would be at the bottom of every single one.
>
> Perhaps, it might also trigger "same"-blindness: seeing the same thing
> again and again makes it less and less likely to re
> They might read it when reading other people's messages since
> it would be at the bottom of every single one.
Perhaps, it might also trigger "same"-blindness: seeing the same thing
again and again makes it less and less likely to really percieve it.
Hadley
Hi, Gabor: Yes. Saying more often communicates less. Spencer Graves
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> I was trying to keep it to 4 lines making it more likely read
> than a longer description.
>
> On 7/16/06, Spencer Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, Gabor:
>>
>> Sounds great. May I
I was trying to keep it to 4 lines making it more likely read
than a longer description.
On 7/16/06, Spencer Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Gabor:
>
> Sounds great. May I suggest a minor modification something like the
> following;
>
> >R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
On 7/16/06, hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I doubt anyone actually reads the bottom of the emails,
> and generally it is too late anyway, as they have already sent the
> message. Much like the opening text in R, details in footer tend to
> trigger legalese neurons and are
Or just reminding the rules to the list now and then (as it was done today). I,
for one, am happy I got reminded, and appologise for my previous posting.
Trying to provide reproductible code forced me to find my own mistake!
mihai
hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personally, I doubt an
Personally, I doubt anyone actually reads the bottom of the emails,
and generally it is too late anyway, as they have already sent the
message. Much like the opening text in R, details in footer tend to
trigger legalese neurons and are largely ignored.
I think it would be more useful to radically
Hi, Gabor:
Sounds great. May I suggest a minor modification something like the
following;
>R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE include in your post minimal, self-contained, reproducible
code as suggested in postin
I would like to propose that we change the trailer on r-help
messages which is currently:
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
to add the following 4th line:
an
13 matches
Mail list logo
