[R] do.call and environments

2004-03-10 Thread Thomas Petzoldt
Hello, I want to call a function fx given by name, where some global variables (in the environment of fx) are passed to the function. For compatibility reasons I cannot modify the parameter list of fx and I want to avoid setting variables in the global environment (e.g. via -) Is there a way,

RE: [R] do.call and environments

2004-03-10 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Try this: x - 7 fx - function(y) print(x*y) f - function(fun, x) { myfx - eval(parse(text=deparse(fun))) myfx(3) } f(fx,2) # uses 2, not 7, for x This creates a new function myfx which has the same functionality as fx but is created in the body of f and therefore has that

Re: [R] do.call and environments

2004-03-10 Thread Tony Plate
The reason in your example that fx() doesn't find 'x' is that the lexical scope of fx() does not include 'x'. So, this is what must be fixed, in one way or another. One simple way to make your example work is to define fx() in a place where its lexical scope includes the variables you want it

RE: [R] do.call and environments

2004-03-10 Thread Liaw, Andy
Seems to me what you want is dynamic scoping: `x' is not defined in `fx'. You want `x' to be found in the scope of the function(s) that calls `fx', rather than the environment where `fx' is defined. I was told (thanks, Robert!) that that is a very bad idea: as the author of `fx', you want some

Re: [R] do.call and environments

2004-03-10 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
PROTECTED],R-Help [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [R] do.call and environments The reason in your example that fx() doesn't find 'x' is that the lexical scope of fx() does not include 'x'. So, this is what must be fixed, in one way or another. One simple way to make your example work