Re: [R] standardized random effects with ranef.lme()

2006-07-31 Thread Doran, Harold
; Dirk Enzmann Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [R] standardized random effects with ranef.lme() Why do the results differ although the estimates (random effects and thus their variances) are almost identical? I noticed that lme() does not compute the standard errors

Re: [R] standardized random effects with ranef.lme()

2006-07-30 Thread Spencer Graves
Have you tried RSiteSearch(MLWin)? I just got 29 hits. I wonder if any one of these might relate to your question? If you would like more help on this issue from this listserve, please submit another post, preferably illustrating your question with the simplest possible

Re: [R] standardized random effects with ranef.lme()

2006-07-30 Thread Doran, Harold
Why do the results differ although the estimates (random effects and thus their variances) are almost identical? I noticed that lme() does not compute the standard errors of the variances of the random effects - for several reasons, but if this is true, how does ranef()

[R] standardized random effects with ranef.lme()

2006-07-24 Thread Dirk Enzmann
Using ranef() (package nlme, version 3.1-75) with an 'lme' object I can obtain random effects for intercept and slope of a certain level (say: 1) - this corresponds to (say level 1) residuals in MLWin. Maybe I'm mistaken here, but the results are identical. However, if I try to get the