Dear list,
I ran into a strange behaviour of the pnbinom function - or maybe I
just made a stupid mistake.
First thing is that pnbinom seems to be very slow. The other - more
interesting one - is that I get two different curves when I plot the
estimated density and the density given by pnbinom.
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, dax42 wrote:
Dear list,
I ran into a strange behaviour of the pnbinom function - or maybe I just made
a stupid mistake.
First thing is that pnbinom seems to be very slow. The other - more
interesting one - is that I get two different curves when I plot the
estimated density
dax42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear list,
I ran into a strange behaviour of the pnbinom function - or maybe I
just made a stupid mistake.
First thing is that pnbinom seems to be very slow. The other - more
interesting one - is that I get two different curves when I plot the
estimated
dax42 Dax42 at web.de writes:
:
: Dear list,
:
: I ran into a strange behaviour of the pnbinom function - or maybe I
: just made a stupid mistake.
: First thing is that pnbinom seems to be very slow. The other - more
: interesting one - is that I get two different curves when I plot the
:
Hi,
I am sorry for the incorrect terms. Of course I mean the cumulative
distribution functions.
As I just got two answers telling me my problem does not exist, I tried
again on a different setup - and indeed it works.
So, my first run was done on a Mac OS X 10.3.7 running R 2.0.0, GUI
version.
I tried it on Windows XP under both 2.0.1 and 2.1.0 and it seemed to
work both times. I issued the command:
set.seed(1)
before both runs to ensure that I was actually using the same
random numbers. I suggest you try that in all your runs too just
in case its a problem with some sets of
