RE: [R] F Dist

2004-02-19 Thread Liaw, Andy
... because that should have been: pf(2.45, 6, 28) [1] 0.9503618 pf(2.35, 10, 20) [1] 0.950176 When arguments are not named, the order is significant. Andy From: Joerg Schaber Hi, why is it that in tables for the F distribution it is for example F0.95[6,28]=2.45 or

Re: [R] F Dist

2004-02-19 Thread Pierre-Andre Cornillon
Hello, the order of argument is not the correct one: p(2.45,6,28) [1] 0.9503618 P.A. On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Joerg Schaber wrote: Hi, why is it that in tables for the F distribution it is for example F0.95[6,28]=2.45 or F0.95[10,20]=2.35 but pf(6,28,2.45) [1] 0.8854934