Re: [R] foo.RData or foo.r?

2003-10-04 Thread Martin Maechler
Just one thing to add to Jason's very helpful posting and explanations: Jason == Jason Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 04 Oct 2003 07:30:03 +1200 writes: . . Jason Short answer: anything that's R code *should* be Jason named with .R at the end.

re: [R] foo.Rdata or foo.r?

2003-10-04 Thread Federico Calboli
Dear All, thanks for your clarifications. When I said that my .RData files load fines, I should have added that the files are images that contain objetcs, not code. In the bad ol' days under the thrall of the dark ruler (W2K), I would write all my code in text files, saved as foo.txt, and then

Re: [R] foo.RData or foo.r?

2003-10-03 Thread Peter Dalgaard BSA
Federico Calboli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear All, I suspect this is kind of dumb, but when I was under the thrall of the dark lord (read, using a W2K box), all my work in R files came out as foo.RData. I moved on to GNU/Linux, and all the old .RData files keep on working as they used.

RE: [R] foo.RData or foo.r?

2003-10-03 Thread Adaikalavan RAMASAMY
*.R is for the script file and is ASCII type. *.Rdata (or sometimes *.rda) is the usual extension for R data and contains binary information. If you try to cat a *.Rdata file, you will end up with gibberish as it is binary. Try opening *.Rdata with emacs if you can. Emacs will recognise it as a

RE: [R] foo.RData or foo.r?

2003-10-03 Thread Federico Calboli
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 13:16, Adaikalavan RAMASAMY wrote: *.R is for the script file and is ASCII type. *.Rdata (or sometimes *.rda) is the usual extension for R data and contains binary information. If you try to cat a *.Rdata file, you will end up with gibberish as it is binary. Try

Re: [R] foo.RData or foo.r?

2003-10-03 Thread Jason Turner
Federico Calboli wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 13:16, Adaikalavan RAMASAMY wrote: *.R is for the script file and is ASCII type. *.Rdata (or sometimes *.rda) is the usual extension for R data and contains binary information. If you try to cat a *.Rdata file, you will end up with gibberish as it is