On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, David Peltier wrote:
hello,
I am using R 2.5.0 under OS X.
I am having sh: line 1: make: command not found error message when
I run R CMD check :
Any help would be appreciated.
Well, that is easy: 'make' is missing. It should be there in the OS, so
you need to
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Crispin Miller wrote:
Hi,
I have a piece of code that decides at runtime whether to load a data
package (and which package to load).
This is then done with a call to:
library(x)
(where x is a character variable containing the package name).
This causes R CMD check
Many thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prof
Brian Ripley
Sent: 25 April 2007 16:03
To: Crispin Miller
Cc: R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] R CMD CHECK and require() / library() methods
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007
Marc Schwartz (via MN) writes:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 22:16 +1000, Robert King wrote:
Here is another thing that might help work out what is happening. If I
use --no-install, ade4 actually fails as well, in the same way as zipfR.
[Desktop]$ R CMD check --no-install ade4
* checking for
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 13:20 +0200, Kurt Hornik wrote:
Marc Schwartz (via MN) writes:
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 22:16 +1000, Robert King wrote:
Here is another thing that might help work out what is happening. If I
use --no-install, ade4 actually fails as well, in the same way as zipfR.
Robert King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm testing a FC5 machine for use in a student lab. R 2.3.1 is installed and
seems to work fine. There is one peculiarity - the logins are authenticating
to a server, and a verbose flag is set somewhere, leading to lots of
spurious messages like this
No output from the tools command
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Robert King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm testing a FC5 machine for use in a student lab. R 2.3.1 is installed
and
seems to work fine. There is one peculiarity - the logins are
authenticating
to a server, and a verbose flag is
Here is another thing that might help work out what is happening. If I
use --no-install, ade4 actually fails as well, in the same way as zipfR.
[Desktop]$ R CMD check --no-install ade4
* checking for working latex ... OK
* using log directory '/home/rak776/Desktop/ade4.Rcheck'
* using
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 22:16 +1000, Robert King wrote:
Here is another thing that might help work out what is happening. If I
use --no-install, ade4 actually fails as well, in the same way as zipfR.
[Desktop]$ R CMD check --no-install ade4
* checking for working latex ... OK
* using
Christian == Christian Hennig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:21:18 +0100 (BST) writes:
Christian Dear list, R CMD check on my updated package now
Christian generated the following error:
Christian LaTeX errors when creating DVI version. This
Christian typically
Thank you Martin,
Christian Dear list, R CMD check on my updated package now
Christian generated the following error:
Christian LaTeX errors when creating DVI version. This
Christian typically indicates Rd problems.
(...)
Run
R CMD Rd2dvi
directly on the relevant Rd
I have created page [1] in R Wiki on this topic.
http://wiki.r-project.org/rwiki/doku.php?id=developers:runit
Seth, I have also managed to tweak doRUnit.R so that R CMD check gives an error
if the tests fail. I will leave windows port for someone else ;)
Gorjanc Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everyone
What you are trying to do does work, I do it all the time, but
there are
a few details to work out. Because of the above differences I
actually
generate the DESCRIPTION* files from my Makefile, differently
depending
on the target.
I do too. Having a DESCRIPTION.in is
I think you have to remove the DESCRIPTION.in file when you check the
package stand alone. As I recall, if it exists that is the flag to
indicate a bundle. Also beware that the DESCRIPTION file in the stand
alone package is not exactly the same as the DESCRIPTION.in file when it
is part of
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I think you have to remove the DESCRIPTION.in file when you check the
package stand alone. As I recall, if it exists that is the flag to
indicate a bundle. Also beware that the DESCRIPTION file in the stand
alone package is not exactly the same as the
Sorry, just pressing the send button brought the solution :-)
The problem has nothing to do with any programming issues, but rather with
confusion about directories to use R CMD from.
Regards, Ulrike
-- Forwarded Message ---
From: Ulrike Grömping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
R never reloads a package if not asked to, and it is usually users (not R)
who `get confused'.
Specifying Suggests: multtest just tells 'check' that it needs to be
available: it does not tell R to load it. (It also tells install.packages
enough to install it if you asked for dependencies to
On 8/15/05 5:19 PM, Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you remember to declare a dependency on package 'methods'? I suspect
not. Please see `Writing R Extensions'.
As usual, Professor Ripley, you are correct
Thanks,
Sean
__
Did you remember to declare a dependency on package 'methods'? I suspect
not. Please see `Writing R Extensions'.
setClass is not part of base R, and those checks are being run with base
R only. I expect your package will not load when R is run with no default
packages. (Quite a few people
On 8/15/05, Sean Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a peculiar problem that I'm sure is a simple one, but I can't figure
out what my mistake is. Can someone enlighten me? I have a simple file,
class.R:
##
setClass(abc,representation(a = character, b = ANY))
I have a package
Liaw, Andy wrote:
One suggestion: After you break the check process, look at the file
C:\Gregor\devel\GeneticsPed\GeneticsPed.Rcheck\GeneticsPed-Ex.R
and try to see if you can run that in batch mode.
You can also look into GeneticsPed-Ex.Rout that tells you where the
stuff hangs.
Uwe
Andy
One suggestion: After you break the check process, look at the file
C:\Gregor\devel\GeneticsPed\GeneticsPed.Rcheck\GeneticsPed-Ex.R
and try to see if you can run that in batch mode.
Andy
From: Gorjanc Gregor
Hello!
I am building a package, which includes also one Fortran subroutine,
Chris Jackson wrote:
In my experience these are usually signs of an error in your NAMESPACE
file, such as a function name in the NAMESPACE which does not match the
function name in the package.
If the NAMESPACE is not the problem (is it???) there are several other
points - one has to look closer.
In my experience these are usually signs of an error in your NAMESPACE
file, such as a function name in the NAMESPACE which does not match the
function name in the package.
Chris
Ollivier TARAMASCO wrote:
I wrote a library which seems to work on my PC, and on different Unix
systems.
As it is
Ross Boylan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 06:58:56PM +0200, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
I can't tell from the docs (Writing R Extensions 1.9.1) exactly what
environment the tests, examples, and vignettes that R CMD check tries to
run are in.
In particular:
1) how do I get the package
Ross Boylan wrote:
I can't tell from the docs (Writing R Extensions 1.9.1) exactly what
environment the tests, examples, and vignettes that R CMD check tries to
run are in.
In particular:
1) how do I get the package loaded?
2) how do I access data in the data/ directory?
3) where is the material
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 06:58:56PM +0200, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
I can't tell from the docs (Writing R Extensions 1.9.1) exactly what
environment the tests, examples, and vignettes that R CMD check tries to
run are in.
In particular:
1) how do I get the package loaded?
2)
File::Basename is part of Perl. Your @ING looks wrong (it contains no
Perl system directories). Do you have any Perl environmental variables
such as PERL5LIB set?
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, TEMPL Matthias wrote:
Dear R users and developers,
I'm trying to build a package. The R CMD build works
It was an (for me not understandable) problem on miktex
I´m solving my problem, by copying ..\texmf\miktex\bin\etex.exe to latex.exe I´m
wondering that now R CMD check works now.
Sorry, for my question to R help.
Matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: TEMPL Matthias
Gesendet:
Arne Henningsen wrote:
Hi,
I added a new function predict.systemfit to our package systemfit to make
it closer to other packages (e.g. lm). Now R CMD check complains that the
generic function predict has only the argument object, while our function
predict.systemfit has more arguments.
Hi,
thanks, Uwe and Jari, for your helpful comments! Indeed, I forgot the ...
argument. R did not exactly say what was wrong. It just said:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
predict:
function(object, ...)
predict.systemfit:
function(object, data, se.fit, se.pred,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Thomas Stabla wrote:
Hello again,
I tried to isolate the source code, which causes the error messages:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
Error in .tryQuietly({ : Error in library(package, lib.loc = lib.loc,
character.only =
Thomas Stabla wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Thomas Stabla wrote:
Hello again,
I tried to isolate the source code, which causes the error messages:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
Error in .tryQuietly({ : Error in library(package, lib.loc = lib.loc,
Hello again,
I tried to isolate the source code, which causes the error messages:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
Error in .tryQuietly({ : Error in library(package, lib.loc = lib.loc, character.only =
TRUE, verbose = FALSE) :
package/namespace load failed
* checking
Thomas Stabla wrote:
Hello again,
I tried to isolate the source code, which causes the error messages:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
Error in .tryQuietly({ : Error in library(package, lib.loc = lib.loc, character.only =
TRUE, verbose = FALSE) :
package/namespace
Thomas == Thomas Stabla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:15:50 +0100 (CET) writes:
Thomas Hello,
Thomas I'm getting some error messages from R CMD check I can't deal with.
Thomas I'm working under Linux with R 1.8.1
Thomas The package working directory can be found
Thomas Stabla wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting some error messages from R CMD check I can't deal with.
I'm working under Linux with R 1.8.1
The package working directory can be found at:
http://www.uni-bayreuth.de/departments/math/org/mathe7/DISTR/distr.tar.gz
Here's the 00check.log produced by R CMD
In the directory where you ran the check, you should have a subdirectory
like pkg.Rcheck (substitute pkg with the name of your package). That's
where the package got installed for the purpose of the check. You could try
to source() the files there and see if you can find the problem.
HTH,
Andy
The error was simply a missing end-of-line character in the last line in
one of the R files.
Thanks to Brian Ripley and Roger Bivand.
--
John Bjornar Bremnes
Norwegian Meteorological Institute (met.no)
Research and Development Department
P.O.Box 43 Blindern, N-0313 Oslo, Norway
Phone: (+47)
You have an error in the R files of your package. Before you even do
R CMD check, do try loading the package in R.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, John Bjørnar Bremnes wrote:
when using R CMD check mypkg I get the error message
...
* checking R files for library.dynam ... OK
* checking generic/method
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Robin Hankin wrote:
Hello everybody
I'm writing a package and am trying to get it past R CMD check . It
has no C or Fortan code, just R code.
R CMD check . reports that the examples don't work:
r:Davies% R CMD check .
* checking for working latex ... OK
*
* checking for CRLF line endings in C sources/headers ... OK
* creating Davies-Ex.R ... OK
* checking examples ... ERROR
Running examples failed.
r:Davies%
How do I tell which .Rd file is the problem? (I suspect that the
examples aren't actually being executed because most of them take a
Sorry, there was a typo in my answer:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, David Scott wrote:
.
.
.
lots of stuff cut
.
.
examples aren't actually being executed because most of them take a
long time and the error is pretty much instantaneous).
Rcmd check makes a directory called libname.Rcheck. Inside
Hello everybody
thanks for your help with my R CMD check problem. The file
Davies-Ex.Rout does indeed contain a transcript of the examples.
I've found the .Rd file that contains the problem. The relevant
command executes perfectly when I cut-and-paste it onto the R command
line, but not when
44 matches
Mail list logo
