[EMAIL PROTECTED] (A.J. Rossini) writes:
> I like SWIG (well, it facilitates wrappers for Python really well),
> but it's not perfect.
>
> I've not delved into the difficulties in any detail yet, but we've had
> problems with mixing SWIG and Boost.python for connections with Python
> code -- and
I like SWIG (well, it facilitates wrappers for Python really well),
but it's not perfect.
I've not delved into the difficulties in any detail yet, but we've had
problems with mixing SWIG and Boost.python for connections with Python
code -- and the Boost.python mechanism "feels" like DTL's RS cod
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:01:28 -0700, Duncan Temple Lang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>SWIG is an extensible system and so people
>other than the SWIG developers can indeed
>provide facilities for supporting R.
>I am surprised nobody has done it yet
>and remember asking you whether you had considere
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:12:24 +0900, "Hisaji ONO"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi.
>
> Has R dev. team considered employing SWIG(http://www.swig.org/), which
>supports PHP, Ruby, Java etc.,
>for connecting C/C++ libraries with R?
I don't know, but it looks from their web page as though you're askin
