On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 09:15 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wish some of the corporations or
universities that are using SAS would fund the R group a little, too.
We do via the R Foundation!
http://www.r-project.org/nosvn/foundation/memberlist.html
Talk to the folks at your institutions...
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Henric Nilsson wrote:
At 05:24 2004-04-28, Liliana Forzani wrote:
I have a code in sas (NLMIXED) and I have a hard time converting to r
1)it is poisson, with random intercept, but
it have an offset. Means, I do not want one of the coefficient to be
At 11:39 2004-04-28, Göran Broström wrote:
If I recall correctly, neither glmmML nor glmmPQL (from MASS) handles
offset terms. But GLMM in the lme4 package does.
glmmML handles offset terms.
You're right. I confused it with glmmML's not being able to fit models with
family = gaussian. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wensui liu
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] sas vs. r
I like R more than SAS. My job is doing research on clinical
trial. But I was told that FDA only accepts the
Please check http://www.r-project.org/; - search - R site
search. My search just now for R vs. SAS for FDA produced 14 matches.
My bottom line from reading comments on this issue is that it is like
the comment 20 years ago that, Nobody in management ever got fired for
buying IBM. The
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, wensui liu wrote:
I like R more than SAS. My job is doing research on clinical trial. But
I was told that FDA only accepts the result from SAS. Is that true? TOO
BAD.
No, it isn't true. The FDA does not approve or certify statistical
software. Its main regulation
wensui liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like R more than SAS. My job is doing research on clinical
trial. But I was told that FDA only accepts the result from SAS. Is
that true? TOO BAD.
No. But it's not that simple.
See previous postings (within the last 2 months) on validation and
FDA.
