algorithm, which is beyond your reach in the
normal usage of R.
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 30-May-05 Time: 09:43:56
! Not strange at all.
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 30-May-05 Time: 11:41:28
-- XFMail
-fisher.test(ff)$p.value
[1] -1.384892e-12
Peter, I'm not sure which is the more interesting!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 03-Jun-05
On 03-Jun-05 Ted Harding wrote:
And on mine
(A: PII, Red Had 9, R-1.8.0):
ff - c(0,10,250,5000); dim(ff) - c(2,2);
1-fisher.test(ff)$p.value
[1] 1.268219e-11
(B: PIII, SuSE 7.2, R-2.1.0beta):
ff - c(0,10,250,5000); dim(ff) - c(2,2);
1-fisher.test(ff)$p.value
[1
-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 06-Jun-05 Time: 10:20:01
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https
to try!
The other factor to bear in mind is that if the Essays
can be grouped by subject this is likely to influence many
of the scores (such as the above).
Hoping this helps and does not distract!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding
context. If not (i.e. all the work has to be done inside R), then
of course my sugestion above is not helpful in this case!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 28
was distinctly smaller than the value of the x-coefficient.
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 02-Jul-05 Time: 10:45:04
with the identity
permutation (for N=1000, however, just about all samples give
rho 0.99).
I smell a source of interesting exam questions ...
Over to you!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870
-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 06-Jul-05 Time: 19:29:18
-- XFMail --
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
trivial though).
Göran Broström
But true if both X and Y have positive probability of being
non-zero, n'est-pas?
Tut, tut, Göran!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 07-Jul-05
only if z=0.5. If z0.5, then X/Z and Y/Z are clearly dependent.
How's this?
spencer graves
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
(Ted Harding) wrote:
On 06-Jul-05 Göran Broström wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:06:45AM -0700, Thomas Lumley wrote:
(...)
If X, Y, and Z
-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 04-Aug-03 Time: 09:58:10
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https
or suggestions,
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 03-Aug-03 Time: 09:38:23
-- XFMail
would be only a tiny fraction of the
hundreds of times I have hit delete since 1 August!
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 03-Aug-03 Time: 13:39
is indeed 2^53 -1.
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 13-Aug-03 Time: 14:48:48
-- XFMail
wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 05-Aug-03 Time: 13:00:07
-- XFMail
,
but I can't locate an explanation of this. Can anyone elucidate?
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 06-Aug-03 Time: 22:41:45
linux-gnu
system i686, linux-gnu
status
major1
minor6.1
year 2002
month11
day 01
language R
Is there any other way to determine this sort of information?
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL
while det(I) = 1.
However, you could have an incomplete diagonal (r 1s and
(n-r) 0s where r is the rank of Z*Z').
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 14-Aug-03
([[], Female[Alabama)
[1] 7
attr(,match.length)
[1] 1
regexpr([\\], Female\\Alabama)
[1] 7
attr(,match.length)
[1] 1
regexpr([\]], Female]Alabama)
[1] 7
attr(,match.length)
[1] 1
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 14-Aug-03 Time: 10:20:20
-- XFMail
){(XX-YY)^2}
myfun(xx,yy)
[,1] [,2] [,3]
[1,]014
[2,]101
[3,]410
[The above is inspired by the matlab/octave function meshdom]
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 26-Aug-03 Time: 08:59:48
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 26-Aug-03 Time: 10:05:14
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
vectorised form, if it's fast for n=1 it stays pretty fast
for large n: try it with z-rfishy(1,5); even rfishy(10,5) only
takes a few seconds.
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870
,
so (1) and (2) really are separate operations).
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 04-Sep-03 Time: 17:47:39
fm - lm(y ~ x)
panel.abline(fm)
})
Can't think of anything else (other than using a custom superpanel
function).
Deepayan
On Thursday 04 September 2003 11:47 am, Ted Harding wrote:
Sorry Folks,
I'm sure I could suss out the answer myself but I need it
soon ... !
1
, :
... used in an incorrect context
(which is the same error as I got trying an earlier suggestion of
Deepayan's).
Anyway, much obliged for all the help!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44
,
and ?xyplot certainly specifies the above form for specifying
x- and y-limits. I think ...
With thanks as always for any help,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 05-Sep-03
into the R code file of the lattice package, so that
it is loaded every time?
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 05-Sep-03 Time: 19
for questions like this, and do not necessarily expect to
find a procedure which is tailor-made for (e.g.) this particular question!
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date
from some time back is compatible with a recent R, other than
simply trying it out to see if it works OK?
With thanks, and best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 16
)) final_exit (all done);
else nonfinal_exit (some left);
For 3 out of 5 this gives {1,2,3},(1,2,4},{1,2,5},{1,3,4},{1,3,5},
{1,4,5},{2,3,4},{2,3,5},{2,4,5},{3,4,5}.
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax
there would be no problems on that front.
Anyway, after all that, R has now been installed and seems to be working
well.
Thanks!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 18-Sep-03
On 19-Sep-03 James Wettenhall wrote:
BUT, there are some known bugs in the Tcl/Tk that comes with
Redhat 9 (which don't exist in previous Redhat distributions) :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89098
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101678
are
subscripts. In the model for open-source, they are superscripts. Is this
a subtly encoded signal of where she stands?
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 20
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 20-Sep-03 Time: 15:07:59
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to is an expression of the form
X[rowselector, colselector]
Hope this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 30-Sep-03 Time: 19:48:09
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 01-Oct-03 Time: 13:09:51
-- XFMail
, you don't seem to be thinking about trends, cycles etc. ...
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 01-Oct-03 Time: 17:49:21
]
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 04-Oct-03 Time: 20:20:29
)).
Or you can compute the complete frequency distribution and divide each
term by the sum of all.
The above 'algorithmicises' the algebra of the generating function for
the counts.
Have fun!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED
really have
available, run
convert -list format
Hoping this helps,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 07-Oct-03 Time: 01:56:04
).
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 08-Oct-03 Time: 01:00:30
-- XFMail
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 09-Oct-03 Time: 00:09:16
-- XFMail
might specify what sort of error or what function it comes
from. Would setting
options(error = break )
do it?
Any other suggestions?
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
be involved in making this stuff available? Upgrade to
current R? Install a beta-version?
Thanks again,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 11-Oct-03
to all for the help!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 12-Oct-03 Time: 13:44:27
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 13-Oct-03 Time: 10:50:16
-- XFMail
to export this data without the e+00?
Try formatC:
pnorm(-6.1)
[1] 5.303423e-10
formatC(pnorm(-6.1),format=f,digits=15)
[1] 0.0530342
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
, but while PNG and the like are quite nice they don't
have the merit of being a vector format, and don't scale well.
Thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 20-Oct-03
-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 20-Oct-03 Time: 16:09:56
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https
On 20-Oct-03 Laura Quinn wrote:
Probably a stupid question, but I don't seem to be able to find the
answer I'm looking for from any of the R literature. Basically I have
a matrix with several thousand rows and 20 columns(weather stations)
of wind direction data.
I am wanting to extract a
for nis.na on input
(and you can have parametrised defines too).
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 20-Oct-03 Time: 20:38:01
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 21-Oct-03 Time: 11:27:02
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 21-Oct-03 Time: 17:56:53
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 28-Oct-03 Time: 18:58:10
-- XFMail
, well exemplified by the case described.)
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 28-Oct-03 Time: 18:23:42
where
the default loading of methods is initiated).
With thanks again,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 29-Oct-03 Time: 09:17:22
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 05-Nov-03 Time: 03:06:44
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https
is that I have
learned a lot about R by watching these dynamic discussions. I hope they
will continue!
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 15-Nov-03
On 22-Nov-03 Ted Harding wrote:
[...]
I have a quantitative variable Y and a 4-level ordered factor A
(with very unequal numbers at the different levels, by the way).
The command
lm(Y ~ A)
returns (amongst other stuff) an intercept, and coefficients
A.L, A.Q and A.C for the Linear
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 29-Nov-03 Time: 10:09:18
-- XFMail
provide this
information.
Best wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 02-Dec-03 Time: 14:25:52
-- XFMail
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 04-Dec-03 Time: 22:09:06
-- XFMail
that the thread was
gettin off-topic, since we're now back to R ... !)
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 13-Dec-03 Time: 12
for testing (near)equality non-integer numbers, and
many other more structured objects.
identical only if you understand more about the S language ;-)
Cheers,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax
Sorry, typo:
On 13-Dec-03 Ted Harding wrote:
Example of kernel density estimation:
X-c(rnorm(200),2+0.5*rnorm(300))
hist(X,freq=FALSE,breaks=(-4)+0.2*(0:50))
S-density(X,from=(-4),to=5,bw=0.2)
N-length(S$y)
V1-S$y[1:(N-2)];V2-S$y[2:(N-1)];V3-S$y[3:N]
ix-1+which((V1V2)(V2V3
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 15-Dec-03 Time: 17:22:59
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https
,
the more experienced members could usefully propose that someone's
question would be a good one for r-help.
Let's see how it goes, and support Martin Wegman's initiative.
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL
On 16-Jan-03 Ted Harding wrote:
Hence the multivariate regression model for the data could be
written in matrix form as
Y = X*B + w1*W1 + w2*W2 + w3*W3 + e
[ Y Nxp ; X Nxk ; W1 W2 W3 Nxp matices of factor level indicators;
B kxp ; w1, w2, w3 scalars ]
where e is 3-dim N(0,S), and B
displayed each time.
So it looks as though xyplot is not outputting
to the graphics display when invoked within a loop.
What am I mising?
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167
),
xlab=fit, ylab=)
Many thanks!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 07-Mar-03 Time: 15:37:38
-- XFMail
wishes,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 08-Mar-03 Time: 09:23:20
-- XFMail
On 13-Mar-03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See e.g.
http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/~goeran/euroworkshop/webpages/2002/slides/bri
an.pdf
A very useful summary. Thanks!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44
-x1-x0
y[y==0]-0.001
barplot(height=y,width=w,space=0)
(the extra 0.001 gives a thickened baseline where y=0, to
avoid the impression that there is no bar at such points)
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 26-Mar-03 Time: 09:59:23
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL
On 26-Mar-03 Ted Harding wrote:
On 25-Mar-03 Phillip J. Allen wrote:
However, this kind of situation needs thought about alternative
ways of representing it.
One possibility might be to have the vertical axis invisible,
so that gaps in the data are represented by gaps in the axis
, but let's not exaggerate)
Cheers,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 31-Mar-03 Time: 22:07:36
-- XFMail
of MIX, and am (naively) prepared to try my hand at getting it
into R, but I am wondering generally if this or any of the others
(CAT, PAN) have been tried in R by anyone.
With thanks, and best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted
to
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/R/mix_1.0-1.tar.gz
Further: Is there a pointer to a list of the bugs found?
Thanks again, and best wishes.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date
On 01-Apr-03 Ted Harding wrote:
On 01-Apr-03 Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
I have an R port of MIX, but it is not 100% reliable. However, neither
is the S-PLUS original! (We have found several bugs already.)
When I have a few spare days (if ever?) I will try again. We got
enough to work
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 03-Apr-03 Time: 14:03:33
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
It seems that hypatia.math.ethz.ch is hoarding messages
to the r-help list for up to 13 hours ... ?
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 03-Apr-03
(direct, please,
and not via the list!).
==
From j.logsdon at lancaster.ac.uk:
Dear all
Off topic to some extent but Ted Harding has just called me to say he is
(a) seeing large delays in the list messages when it is sent internally
from hypatia.math.ethz.ch
thanks again!
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 06-Apr-03 Time: 12:04:26
-- XFMail
://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/acrosdk/DOCS/pdfspec.pdf
HTML output from groff is also available (though PDFmarks are silent
in HTML -- use other tags defined for the output format 'html').
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted
Hi Folks,
Consider the following example (artificial, but it illustates the point):
r2-sqrt(2)
x-2-r2*r2
print(c(pi,sqrt(pi)),digits=5)
[1] 3.1416 1.7725
print(c(pi,sqrt(pi),x),digits=5)
[1] 3.1416e+00 1.7725e+00 -4.4409e-16
whereas I would prefer
[1] 3.1416 1.7725
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 29-May-03 Time: 00:03:19
-- XFMail
of June 1997, R-1.6.2, medium-speed 733MHz single processor with 512MB RAM
running Linux; 15 seconds to draw the curve; 'gs' 5.5 took about 5 secs).
At a guess your 'gv' is not coping. It's not a PS problem as such.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted
On 02-Jun-03 Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote [to r-devel]:
BELL David J [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No file attached??
Fairly well-known virus behaviour, but did you really get it from
r-devel? (check headers for stat.math.ethz.ch)
There seem to be no instances of the actual virus-laden message in
it had received a virus from r-help, and
replied to the list.
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 03-Jun-03 Time: 11:38:40
,
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 12-Jun-03 Time: 14:21:00
-- XFMail
testing in the wild, so if anyone would like to have
a copy of cat_0.0-1.tar.gz to try out (16062 bytes) please let me know
and I will send it.
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0
format, providing further semantic
information along the way).
My query is: Can anyone point to troff macro definitions for these tags?
(And, preferably, also to descriptions for their usage)
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding
.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 18-Jun-03 Time: 11:28:06
-- XFMail --
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED
both on the same OS (Unix or Windows) on the same machine.
Can anyone give me clean comparative speeds?
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 20-Jun-03
On 20-Jun-03 Ted Harding wrote:
Sorry to raise what has probably been discussed before,
but I an repeatedly struck by the comparative slowness
of S-plus for Windows compared with R for Linux when doing
much the same thing.
Thanks to all who so promptly responded with comments and information
second time time round (and later) because the pre-interpretation
has already been done once and for all?
[And, for seconds, what is the corresponding situation for S-plus?]
With thanks,
Ted.
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED
301 - 400 of 701 matches
Mail list logo
