, although i guess i am still wondering
why my function in S-PLUS is not correct.
Thanks so much for your response.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: [R] AIC consistency with S-PLUS
I think
hz.ch
Subject: [R] AIC consistency with S-PLUS
Hello-
I understand that log-likelihoods are bound to differ by constants, but
if i estimate AIC for a set of simple nested linear models using the
following 4 methods, shouldn't at least two of them produce the same
ordering of models?
in R:
extr
Hello-
I understand that log-likelihoods are bound to differ by constants, but if i
estimate AIC for a set of simple nested linear models using the following 4
methods, shouldn't at least two of them produce the same ordering of models?
in R:
extractAIC
AIC
in S-PLUS:
AIC
n*log(deviance(mymodel
