Re: [R] Import of Access data via RODBC changes column name (NO to Expr1014) and the content of the column

2007-08-15 Thread Maciej Hoffman-Wecker
Thank you very much Professor Ripley! Afterwards it seems obvious where to look. Have a nice day, Maciej PS: Yes, my machine has not much memory, but it is sufficient for the smaller trial data. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet:

[R] Import of Access data via RODBC changes column name (NO to Expr1014) and the content of the column

2007-08-14 Thread Maciej Hoffman-Wecker
Dear all, I have some problems with importing data from an Access data base via RODBC to R. The data base contains several tables, which all are imported consecutively. One table has a column with column name NO. If I run the code attached on the bottom of the mail I get no complain, but the

Re: [R] Import of Access data via RODBC changes column name (NO to Expr1014) and the content of the column

2007-08-14 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Maciej Hoffman-Wecker wrote: Dear all, I have some problems with importing data from an Access data base via RODBC to R. The data base contains several tables, which all are imported consecutively. One table has a column with column name NO. If I run the code attached

Re: [R] Import of Access data via RODBC changes column name (NO to Expr1014) and the content of the column

2007-08-14 Thread Maciej Hoffman-Wecker
Dear Professor Ripley, Thank you very much for your response. I send the problem, as I didn't have any more ideas were to search for the reason. I didn't say this is a R bug, knowing the responses on such mails.-) But I succeeded in developing a tiny example, that reproduces the bug (wherever

Re: [R] Import of Access data via RODBC changes column name (NO to Expr1014) and the content of the column

2007-08-14 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Maciej Hoffman-Wecker wrote: Dear Professor Ripley, Thank you very much for your response. I send the problem, as I didn't have any more ideas were to search for the reason. I didn't say this is a R bug, knowing the responses on such mails.-) But I succeeded in