Re: [R] Mixed effects multinomial regression and meta-analysis

2007-03-06 Thread Viechtbauer Wolfgang \(STAT\)
://www.wvbauer.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Inman, Brant A. M.D. Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 00:56 To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Cc: Weigand, Stephen D. Subject: [R] Mixed effects multinomial regression and meta-analysis R

Re: [R] Mixed effects multinomial regression and meta-analysis

2007-03-06 Thread David Duffy
I just realized that the example I used in my previous posting today is incorrect because it is a binary response, not a multilevel response (small, medium, large) such as my real life problem has. I apologize for the confusion. The example is incorrect, but the multinomial problem is

[R] Mixed effects multinomial regression and meta-analysis

2007-03-05 Thread Inman, Brant A. M.D.
R Experts: I am conducting a meta-analysis where the effect measures to be pooled are simple proportions. For example, consider this data from Fleiss/Levin/Paik's Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2003, p189) on smokers: Study N Event P(Event) 1 86 83

Re: [R] Mixed effects multinomial regression and meta-analysis

2007-03-05 Thread Inman, Brant A. M.D.
R-Experts: I just realized that the example I used in my previous posting today is incorrect because it is a binary response, not a multilevel response (small, medium, large) such as my real life problem has. I apologize for the confusion. The example is incorrect, but the multinomial