Thanks to everyone for the info. It is very valuable. I am a little bit
uneasy about conflicting reports regarding RHEL 3, but I guess at this
point I just need to try and see. It's also very soothing to know that
there is an official 64-bit build on CRAN.
Thanks again for taking time to answer,
Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ATLAS, you need to build shared ATLAS libraries (rather than
static). This requires some modifications to the configuation files
for ATLAS. But my experience shows that R itself builds out of the
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Peter Dalgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ATLAS, you need to build shared ATLAS libraries (rather than
static). This requires some modifications to the configuation files
for ATLAS. But my experience shows that
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/r-devel echo
'set.seed(1);M-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))' |
BUILD-GOTO/bin/R -q --vanilla
set.seed(1);M-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))
[1] 29.12 1.39 32.21 0.00 0.00
[EMAIL
Hi,
We are planning to buy a 64-bit Linux machine which will mainly run R.
There was an interesting thread on 64-bits on r-help back in April that
basically confirmed that the 64-bit R is fine as long as the length of
an atomic object is less than 2^31 - 1.
My specific question is on which
I've built (and routinely use) 64 bit R on the following platforms:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (AMD Opteron 848)
Fedora Core 2 x86_64 (AMD Athlon 64 3800+)
SuSE SLES 8 (AMD Opteron 248)
One problem that has come up is that if you want to link R with ATLAS,
you need to build shared
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Vadim Ogranovich wrote:
Hi,
We are planning to buy a 64-bit Linux machine which will mainly run R.
There was an interesting thread on 64-bits on r-help back in April that
basically confirmed that the 64-bit R is fine as long as the length of
an atomic object is less than 2^31
We've had good experience so far with the threaded Goto BLAS (on Opteron
244/248/250, SLES8).
Has anyone tried building R with supposedly more optimized compilers (PGI,
EKO, etc.)? If so, how do they stack up against GCC?
Best,
Andy
From: Roger D. Peng
I've built (and routinely use) 64
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Roger D. Peng wrote:
I've built (and routinely use) 64 bit R on the following platforms:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (AMD Opteron 848)
Fedora Core 2 x86_64 (AMD Athlon 64 3800+)
SuSE SLES 8 (AMD Opteron 248)
One problem that has come up is that if you want to link R
Roger D. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've built (and routinely use) 64 bit R on the following platforms:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (AMD Opteron 848)
Fedora Core 2 x86_64 (AMD Athlon 64 3800+)
SuSE SLES 8 (AMD Opteron 248)
Nice to know about the Enterprise variants. FC2/3 and
Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ATLAS, you need to build shared ATLAS libraries (rather than
static). This requires some modifications to the configuation files
for ATLAS. But my experience shows that R itself builds out of the
box on these systems.
However, you will
11 matches
Mail list logo
