Re: [R] Specifying suitable PC to run R

2003-10-10 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My first choice is get as much memory on your machine as you can; 1GB since this the most that R can use. R can use up to 2Gb, but Windows is unlikely to give you that much -- 1.7Gb has been achieved (see the CHANGES file, I believe). -- Brian

[R] Specifying suitable PC to run R

2003-10-09 Thread Michael Dewey
If I am buying a PC where the most compute intensive task will be running R and I do not have unlimited resources what trade-offs should I make? Specifically should I go for 1 - more memory, or 2 - faster processor, or 3 - something else? If it makes a difference I shall be running Windows on it

Re: [R] Specifying suitable PC to run R

2003-10-09 Thread Roger D. Peng
On Windows, I find that having as much memory as I can possibly afford makes a real difference with R. Since I always end up having larger datasets/problems then I thought I'd have. My general strategy is to maximize the amount of memory first -- if that doesn't work, then think about

Re: [R] Specifying suitable PC to run R

2003-10-09 Thread james . holtman
cc: Sent by: Subject: [R] Specifying suitable PC to run R [EMAIL PROTECTED