Re: [R] Wald tests and Huberized variances (was: A comment about R:)

2006-01-05 Thread Achim Zeileis
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Peter Muhlberger wrote: One comment in advance: please use a more meaningful subject. I would have missed this mail if a colleague hadn't pointed me to it. I'm someone who from time to time comes to R to do applied stats for social science research. [snip] I would also

Re: [R] Wald tests and Huberized variances (was: A comment about R:)

2006-01-05 Thread Peter Muhlberger
Thanks Z, it's coming more into focus. I don't know what would work, though maybe it's not impossible to have a richer set of cross-references by interest area--e.g. People interested in econometrics may wish to examine The views help in this regard, tho something in help itself would be

Re: [R] Wald tests and Huberized variances (was: A comment about R:)

2006-01-05 Thread bogdan romocea
Muhlberger Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 12:44 PM To: Achim Zeileis Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [R] Wald tests and Huberized variances (was: A comment about R:) Hi Achim: Your reply is tremendously helpful in addressing some of the outstanding questions I had about R