Does the following answer your question:
set.seed(1)
z0 - rnorm(100)
p.z - 2*pnorm(-abs(z0))
sum(p.z0.05)
[1] 5
pchisq(sum(z0^2), 100, lower=FALSE)
[1] 0.917285
Some of the 100 (in this case) normal random deviates seem
statistically significant, even though the
Hello,
I'm posting this to receive some comments/hints about a rather statistical than
R-technical question ... .
In an anova of a lme factor SSPos11 shows up non-significant, but in the t-test
of the summay 2 of the 4 levels (one for constrast) are significant. See below
for some truncated
